Multilevel Latent Profile Analysis With Covariates: Identifying Job Characteristics Profiles in Hierarchical Data as an Example

被引:103
作者
Makikangas, Anne [1 ]
Tolvanen, Asko [2 ]
Aunola, Kaisa [3 ]
Feldt, Taru [3 ]
Mauno, Saija [1 ,3 ]
Kinnunen, Ulla [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tampere, Fac Social Sci, Psychol, Tampere 33014, Finland
[2] Univ Jyvaskyla, Methodol Ctr Human Sci, Jyvaskyla, Finland
[3] Univ Jyvaskyla, Dept Psychol, Jyvaskyla, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
multilevel latent profile analysis; clustered data; hierarchical structure; job demand-control-support model; PERSON-CENTERED APPROACH; GROWTH MIXTURE-MODELS; MONTE-CARLO; RESIDUAL VARIANCES; NESTING STRUCTURE; IMPACT; NUMBER; LEVEL; COMMITMENT; DECISION;
D O I
10.1177/1094428118760690
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Latent profile analysis (LPA) is a person-centered method commonly used in organizational research to identify homogeneous subpopulations of employees within a heterogeneous population. However, in the case of nested data structures, such as employees nested in work departments, multilevel techniques are needed. Multilevel LPA (MLPA) enables adequate modeling of subpopulations in hierarchical data sets. MLPA enables investigation of variability in the proportions of Level 1 profiles across Level 2 units, and of Level 2 latent classes based on the proportions of Level 1 latent profiles and Level 1 ratings, and the extent to which covariates drawn from the different hierarchical levels of the data affect the probability of a membership of a particular profile. We demonstrate the use of MLPA by investigating job characteristics profiles based on the job-demand-control-support (JDCS) model using data from 1,958 university employees clustered in 78 work departments. The implications of the results for organizational research are discussed, together with several issues related to the potential of MLPA for wider application.
引用
收藏
页码:931 / 954
页数:24
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Allison Kenneth R, 2016, Prev Med Rep, V4, P331, DOI 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.06.016
[2]  
Asparouhov T, 2008, ADVANCES IN LATENT VARIABLE MIXTURE MODELS, P27
[3]   The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior [J].
Barsade, SG .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2002, 47 (04) :644-675
[4]   Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: Implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes [J].
Bauer, DJ ;
Curran, PJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2003, 8 (03) :338-363
[5]   An Introduction to Latent Variable Mixture Modeling (Part 1): Overview and Cross-Sectional Latent Class and Latent Profile Analyses [J].
Berlin, Kristoffer S. ;
Williams, Natalie A. ;
Parra, Gilbert R. .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 39 (02) :174-187
[6]  
Bliese P.D., 2000, MULTILEVEL THEORY RE, P3, DOI DOI 10.12691/EDUCATION-3-1-14
[7]   Back to Basics with Mixed-Effects Models: Nine Take-Away Points [J].
Bliese, Paul D. ;
Maltarich, Mark A. ;
Hendricks, Jonathan L. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 33 (01) :1-23
[8]   Improper solutions in structural equation models - Causes, consequences, and strategies [J].
Chen, FN ;
Bollen, KA ;
Paxton, P ;
Curran, PJ ;
Kirby, JB .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2001, 29 (04) :468-508
[9]   The Impact of Ignoring a Level of Nesting Structure in Multilevel Growth Mixture Models: A Monte Carlo Study [J].
Chen, Qi ;
Kwok, Oi-Man ;
Luo, Wen ;
Willson, Victor L. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2010, 17 (04) :570-589
[10]   On the Application of the Three-Step Approach to Growth Mixture Models [J].
Diallo, Thierno M. O. ;
Lu, HuiZhong .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2017, 24 (05) :714-732