Learning Value Functions in Interactive Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization

被引:63
作者
Branke, Juergen [1 ]
Greco, Salvatore [2 ,3 ]
Slowinski, Roman [4 ,5 ]
Zielniewicz, Piotr [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Catania, Dept Econ & Business, I-95124 Catania, Italy
[3] Univ Portsmouth, Portsmouth Business Sch, Portsmouth PO1 2UP, Hants, England
[4] Poznan Univ Tech, Inst Comp Sci, PL-60965 Poznan, Poland
[5] Polish Acad Sci, Syst Res Inst, PL-01447 Warshaw, Poland
关键词
Evolutionary multiobjective optimization; interactive procedure; ordinal regression; preference learning; GENETIC ALGORITHM; DECISION-MAKING; PREFERENCES; MODEL; SET;
D O I
10.1109/TEVC.2014.2303783
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper proposes an interactive multiobjective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) that attempts to learn a value function capturing the users' true preferences. At regular intervals, the user is asked to rank a single pair of solutions. This information is used to update the algorithm's internal value function model, and the model is used in subsequent generations to rank solutions incomparable according to dominance. This speeds up evolution toward the region of the Pareto front that is most desirable to the user. We take into account the most general additive value function as a preference model and we empirically compare different ways to identify the value function that seems to be the most representative with respect to the given preference information, different types of user preferences, and different ways to use the learned value function in the MOEA. Results on a number of different scenarios suggest that the proposed algorithm works well over a range of benchmark problems and types of user preferences.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 102
页数:15
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Trends in multiple criteria decision analysis
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, PARSIMONIOUS PREFERE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, 2008 IEEE C EVOLUTIO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1976, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preference and Value Tradeoffs
[5]  
Barbosa H.J. C., 2001, Proc. Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, P203
[6]   Brain-Computer Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization: A Genetic Algorithm Adapting to the Decision Maker [J].
Battiti, Roberto ;
Passerini, Andrea .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2010, 14 (05) :671-687
[7]   The r-Dominance: A New Dominance Relation for Interactive Evolutionary Multicriteria Decision Making [J].
Ben Said, Lamjed ;
Bechikh, Slim ;
Ghedira, Khaled .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2010, 14 (05) :801-818
[8]   Comparative analysis of UTA multicriteria methods [J].
Beuthe, M ;
Scannella, G .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2001, 130 (02) :246-262
[9]   Finding knees in multi-objective optimization [J].
Branke, E ;
Deb, K ;
Dierolf, H ;
Osswald, M .
PARALLEL PROBLEM SOLVING FROM NATURE - PPSN VIII, 2004, 3242 :722-731
[10]   Interactive evolutionary multiobjective optimization driven by robust ordinal regression [J].
Branke, J. ;
Greco, S. ;
Slowinski, R. ;
Zielniewicz, P. .
BULLETIN OF THE POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES-TECHNICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 58 (03) :347-358