High-risk and selected benign breast lesions diagnosed on core needle biopsy: Evidence for and against immediate surgical excision

被引:9
作者
Harbhajanka, Aparna [1 ]
Gilmore, Hannah L. [1 ]
Calhoun, Benjamin C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
ATYPICAL DUCTAL HYPERPLASIA; CARCINOMA IN-SITU; CANCER CHEMOPREVENTION; LOBULAR NEOPLASIA; UPGRADE RATES; RECOMMENDATIONS; SURVEILLANCE; PAPILLOMAS; FREQUENCY; IDENTIFY;
D O I
10.1038/s41379-022-01092-w
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
The vast majority of image-detected breast abnormalities are diagnosed by percutaneous core needle biopsy (CNB) in contemporary practice. For frankly malignant lesions diagnosed by CNB, the standard practice of excision and multimodality therapy have been well-defined. However, for high-risk and selected benign lesions diagnosed by CNB, there is less consensus on optimal patient management and the need for immediate surgical excision. Here we outline the arguments for and against the practice of routine surgical excision of commonly encountered high-risk and selected benign breast lesions diagnosed by CNB. The entities reviewed include atypical ductal hyperplasia, atypical lobular hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ, intraductal papillomas, and radial scars. The data in the peer-reviewed literature confirm the benefits of a patient-centered, multidisciplinary approach that moves away from the reflexive "yes" or "no" for routine excision for a given pathologic diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:1500 / 1508
页数:9
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]   Is surgical excision necessary for atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast diagnosed by mammotome? [J].
Adrales, G ;
Turk, P ;
Wallace, T ;
Bird, R ;
Norton, HJ ;
Greene, F .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 180 (04) :313-315
[2]  
Allen S, 2015, AM SURGEON, V81, P876
[3]   Atypical ductal hyperplasia on vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: suspicion for ductal carcinoma in situ can stratify patients at high risk for upgrade [J].
Allison, Kimberly H. ;
Eby, Peter R. ;
Kohr, Jennifer ;
DeMartini, Wendy B. ;
Lehman, Constance D. .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2011, 42 (01) :41-50
[4]  
American Society of Breast Surgeons, 2016, CONS GUID CONC ASS I
[5]  
Becker L, 2006, CAN ASSOC RADIOL J, V57, P72
[6]   Is Surgical Excision of Core Biopsy Proven Benign Papillomas of the Breast Necessary? [J].
Bennett, Lisa E. ;
Ghate, Sujata V. ;
Bentley, Rex ;
Baker, Jay A. .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2010, 17 (05) :553-557
[7]   Cancer Yield and Patterns of Follow-up for BI-RADS Category 3 after Screening Mammography Recall in the National Mammography Database [J].
Berg, Wendie A. ;
Berg, Jeremy M. ;
Sickles, Edward A. ;
Burnside, Elizabeth S. ;
Zuley, Margarita L. ;
Rosenberg, Robert D. ;
Lee, Cindy S. .
RADIOLOGY, 2020, 296 (01) :32-41
[8]   A systematic review of surgical biopsy for LCIS found at core needle biopsy - Do we have the answer yet? [J].
Buckley, E. S. ;
Webster, F. ;
Hiller, J. E. ;
Roder, D. M. ;
Farshid, G. .
EJSO, 2014, 40 (02) :168-175
[9]  
Calhoun Benjamin C, 2018, Surg Pathol Clin, V11, P1, DOI [10.1016/j.path.2017.09.001, 10.1016/j.path.2017.09.001]
[10]   Recommendations for excision following core needle biopsy of the breast: a contemporary evaluation of the literature [J].
Calhoun, Benjamin C. ;
Collins, Laura C. .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2016, 68 (01) :138-151