GPM Satellite Radar Measurements of Precipitation and Freezing Level in Atmospheric Rivers: Comparison With Ground-Based Radars and Reanalyses

被引:24
|
作者
Cannon, Forest [1 ]
Ralph, F. Martin [1 ]
Wilson, Anna M. [1 ]
Lettenmaier, Dennis P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Scripps Inst Oceanog, Ctr Western Weather & Water Extremes, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Geog, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
atmospheric rivers; GPM; satellite precipitation radar; freezing level height; reanalyses; WEST-COAST; SIERRA-NEVADA; FREQUENCY; CONVECTION; ALGORITHM; WINTER; MODEL; MULTIMODEL; CALIFORNIA; MULTIYEAR;
D O I
10.1002/2017JD027355
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Atmospheric rivers (ARs) account for more than 90% of the total meridional water vapor flux in midlatitudes, and 25-50% of the annual precipitation in the coastal western United States. In this study, reflectivity profiles from the Global Precipitation Measurement Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar (GPM-DPR) are used to evaluate precipitation and temperature characteristics of ARs over the western coast of North America and the eastern North Pacific Ocean. Evaluation of GPM-DPR bright-band height using a network of ground-based vertically pointing radars along the West Coast demonstrated exceptional agreement, and comparison with freezing level height from reanalyses over the eastern North Pacific Ocean also consistently agreed, indicating that GPM-DPR can be used to independently validate freezing level in models. However, precipitation comparison with gridded observations across the western United States indicated deficiencies in GPM-DPR's ability to reproduce the spatial distribution of winter precipitation, likely related to sampling frequency. Over the geographically homogeneous oceanic portion of the domain, sampling frequency was not problematic, and significant differences in the frequency and intensity of precipitation between GPM-DPR and reanalyses highlighted biases in both satellite-observed and modeled AR precipitation. Reanalyses precipitation rates below the minimum sensitivity of GPM-DPR accounted for a 20% increase in total precipitation, and 25% of radar-derived precipitation rates were greater than the 99th percentile precipitation rate in reanalyses. Due to differences in the proportions of precipitation in convective, stratiform bright-band, and non-bright-band conditions, AR conditions contributed nearly 10% more to total precipitation in GPM-DPR than reanalyses.
引用
收藏
页码:12747 / 12764
页数:18
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] GPM Satellite Radar Observations of Precipitation Mechanisms in Atmospheric Rivers
    Cannon, Forest
    Cordeira, Jason M.
    Hecht, Chad W.
    Norris, Joel R.
    Michaelis, Allison
    Demirdjian, Reuben
    Ralph, F. Martin
    MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2020, 148 (04) : 1449 - 1463
  • [2] Validation of TRMM Precipitation Radar through Comparison of Its Multiyear Measurements with Ground-Based Radar
    Liao, Liang
    Meneghini, Robert
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY, 2009, 48 (04) : 804 - 817
  • [3] Synergy of GPM and ground-based radar observations for precipitation estimation and detection of microphysical processes
    Pejcic, Velibor
    Troemel, Silke
    Muehlbauer, Kai
    Saavedra, Pablo
    Beer, Josephin
    Simmer, Clemens
    2018 19TH INTERNATIONAL RADAR SYMPOSIUM (IRS), 2018,
  • [4] Cross-Validation of Observations between the GPM Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar and Ground Based Dual-Polarization Radars
    Biswas, Sounak Kumar
    Chandrasekar, V.
    REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (11):
  • [5] QUANTITATIVE INTER-COMPARISON BETWEEN GPM DUAL-FREQUENCY PRECIPITATION RADAR OBSERVATIONS AND POLARIMETRIC GROUND RADAR MEASUREMENTS
    Biswas, Sounak Kumar
    Chandrasekar, V.
    IGARSS 2018 - 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2018, : 5678 - 5680
  • [6] Cross Validation of Raindrop Size Distribution Retrievals from GPM Dual-frequency Precipitation Radar Using Ground-based Polarimetric Radar
    Chandrasekar, V.
    Biswas, Sounak Kumar
    Le, Minda
    Chen, Haonan
    IGARSS 2018 - 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2018, : 8335 - 8338
  • [7] Improving Satellite-Retrieved Cloud Base Height with Ground-Based Cloud Radar Measurements
    Tan, Zhonghui
    Wang, Ju
    Guo, Jianping
    Liu, Chao
    Zhang, Miao
    Ma, Shuo
    ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2024, 41 (11) : 2131 - 2140
  • [8] Comparison of GPM Core Observatory and Ground-Based Radar Retrieval of Mass-Weighted Mean Raindrop Diameter at Midlatitude
    D'Adderio, Leo Pio
    Vulpiani, Gianfranco
    Porcu, Federico
    Tokay, Ali
    Meneghini, Robert
    JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2018, 19 (10) : 1583 - 1598
  • [9] Calibration and Validation of Swarm Plasma Densities and Electron Temperatures Using Ground-Based Radars and Satellite Radio Occultation Measurements
    Lomidze, Levan
    Knudsen, David J.
    Burchill, Johnathan
    Kouznetsov, Alexei
    Buchert, Stephan C.
    RADIO SCIENCE, 2018, 53 (01) : 15 - 36
  • [10] Atmospheric greenhouse gases retrieved from SCIAMACHY: comparison to ground-based FTS measurements and model results
    Schneising, O.
    Bergamaschi, P.
    Bovensmann, H.
    Buchwitz, M.
    Burrows, J. P.
    Deutscher, N. M.
    Griffith, D. W. T.
    Heymann, J.
    Macatangay, R.
    Messerschmidt, J.
    Notholt, J.
    Rettinger, M.
    Reuter, M.
    Sussmann, R.
    Velazco, V. A.
    Warneke, T.
    Wennberg, P. O.
    Wunch, D.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2012, 12 (03) : 1527 - 1540