Practitioners' views about equity within prenatal services

被引:8
作者
Alderson, P
Williams, C
Farsides, B
机构
[1] Univ London, Inst Educ, Social Sci Res Unit, London WC1H ONR, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Ctr Med Law & Eth, London WC2R 2LS, England
来源
SOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION | 2004年 / 38卷 / 01期
关键词
decision making; ethics; inequalities; prenatal screening;
D O I
10.1177/0038038504039361
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
The British National Health Service (NHS) is based on principles of equal accesses, treatment and outcomes. This article reviews health professionals aims to provide equitable prenatal services and their views on whether women could be equal in their access to services understanding during choice-making and satisfaction about their care inequalities which compromise equity conflicting meanings of equity and the contribution of in hospital ethics seminars to ethical health services are considered. Qualitative research, combining sociological and philosophical methods, investigated the experiences of health care staff attempting to provide equitable services and their practical and ethical problems. A total of 70 staff at a teaching hospital and a district general hospital took part in semi structured interviews followed by 11 innovative in-hospital ethics seminars based on themes derived from the interviews. The 56 seminar participants usually began with clear statements of their equitable aims, but, encouraged by the health care ethicist, they went on to discuss their many concerns about obstacles which complicated the achievement of these aims. The sociological ethics seminars provided unique opportunities for multi-disciplinary discussion of these inequalities and their impact on equitable intentions in health care. Analysis of the contradictions revealed during the seminars is guided by sociological theories that seek to explain the persistence of inequalities in health, and how NHS policies appear to perpetuate and increase them despite practitoners' stated intentions to promote equality.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 80
页数:20
相关论文
共 48 条
[21]  
Illich I., 1976, LIMITS MED
[22]   Health policy and the new genetics [J].
Kaufert, PA .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2000, 51 (06) :821-829
[23]   Eugenics and the new genetics in Britain: Examining contemporary professionals' accounts [J].
Kerr, A ;
Cunningham-Burley, S ;
Amos, A .
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 1998, 23 (02) :175-198
[24]  
Kerr Anne., 2002, GENETIC POLITICS EUG
[25]  
LIPPMAN A, 1994, INTRO GENETIC COUNSE
[26]   Using evidence to inform health policy: case studs [J].
Macintyre, S ;
Chalmers, I ;
Horton, R ;
Smith, R .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7280) :222-225
[27]  
Marmot M., 1999, Social determinants of health
[28]  
PAUL DB, 1992, SOC RES, V59, P663
[29]  
Rapp R, 1999, ANTHR EVERYDAY LIFE, P1
[30]  
SANTALAHTI P, 1998, PRENATAL SCREENING F