Scenario Understanding and Motion Prediction for Autonomous Vehicles-Review and Comparison

被引:50
作者
Karle, Phillip [1 ]
Geisslinger, Maximilian [1 ]
Betz, Johannes [2 ]
Lienkamp, Markus [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Inst Automot Technol, D-85748 Garching, Germany
[2] Univ Penn, Real Time & Embedded Syst Lab, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Predictive models; Trajectory; Autonomous vehicles; Vehicles; Vehicle dynamics; Mathematical models; Dynamics; motion prediction; scenario understanding; human driver behavior; traffic interaction; review; TRAJECTORY PREDICTION; DECISION-MAKING; BEHAVIOR; MODELS; ROAD; VERIFICATION; INFORMATION; THINKING; NETWORK; DRIVER;
D O I
10.1109/TITS.2022.3156011
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Scenario understanding and motion prediction are essential components for completely replacing human drivers and for enabling highly and fully automated driving (SAE-Level 4/5). In deeply stochastic and uncertain traffic scenarios, autonomous driving software must act beyond existing traffic rules and must predict critical situations in advance to provide safe and comfortable rides. In addition, comprehensive prediction models intend not just to reproduce, but rather to encode the human driver behavior, which requires profound scenario understanding. Hence, research in the field of scenario understanding and motion prediction also contributes to enable intelligent driver behavior models in general. This paper aims to review the state of research and outline common methods. A classification of these models is proposed according to their underlying investigation methodology. Based on this classification, a comparison is drawn between three specific prediction methods, which considers specific functional aspects and general requirements of applicability. The results of the comparison reveal a trade-off between holism and explainability in the state of the art. In conclusion, suggestions for future research objectives to solve this conflict are proposed.
引用
收藏
页码:16962 / 16982
页数:21
相关论文
共 209 条
[1]  
Abbeel P., 2004, P 21 INT C MACHINE L, P1, DOI 10.1145/1015330.1015430
[2]   Social LSTM: Human Trajectory Prediction in Crowded Spaces [J].
Alahi, Alexandre ;
Goel, Kratarth ;
Ramanathan, Vignesh ;
Robicquet, Alexandre ;
Li Fei-Fei ;
Savarese, Silvio .
2016 IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR), 2016, :961-971
[3]  
Althoff M., 2010, Reachability analysis and its application to the safety assessment of autonomous cars
[4]   Online Verification of Automated Road Vehicles Using Reachability Analysis [J].
Althoff, Matthias ;
Dolan, John M. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS, 2014, 30 (04) :903-918
[5]   Computing reachable sets of hybrid systems using a combination of zonotopes and polytopes [J].
Althoff, Matthias ;
Stursberg, Olaf ;
Buss, Martin .
NONLINEAR ANALYSIS-HYBRID SYSTEMS, 2010, 4 (02) :233-249
[6]  
Althoff M, 2011, HSCC 11: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HYBRID SYSTEMS: COMPUTATION AND CONTROL, P93
[7]   Real time trajectory prediction for collision risk estimation between vehicles [J].
Ammoun, Samer ;
Nashashibi, Fawzi .
2009 IEEE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT COMPUTER COMMUNICATION AND PROCESSING, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, :417-+
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2018, ARXIV181102146
[9]  
Aoude G. S., 2010, 2010 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2010), P1855, DOI 10.1109/ITSC.2010.5625287
[10]   Driver Behavior Classification at Intersections and Validation on Large Naturalistic Data Set [J].
Aoude, Georges S. ;
Desaraju, Vishnu R. ;
Stephens, Lauren H. ;
How, Jonathan P. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2012, 13 (02) :724-736