Comparison of balloon- and mushroom-retained large-bore gastrostomy catheters

被引:37
作者
Funaki, B
Peirce, R
Lorenz, J
Menocci, PB
Rosenblum, JD
Straus, C
Van Ha, T
Leef, JA
Zaleski, GX
机构
[1] Univ Chicago Hosp, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Racine Radiol Grp, Racine, WI 53405 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.177.2.1770359
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate two different types of percutaneous fluoroscopic gastrostomy procedures and catheters. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Between July 8, 1999, and August 4, 2000, 80 percutaneous gastrostomy catheters were placed in 80 patients in 80 attempts. Twenty-five 16-, 18-, or 20-French balloon-retained catheters and 55 20-French mushroom-retained catheters were inserted. Typically, the type of catheters placed was based on operator preference. However, balloon-retained tubes were preferred for use in patients with obstructive head and neck or esophageal malignancies, and mushroom-retained catheters were preferred for use in demented or combative patients. Follow-up was conducted through chart reviews and telephone interviews. The technical success, procedural complications, and catheter complications were recorded. Chi-square statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS. Technical success was 100% (80/80 patients), and no procedural complications occured. In patients who received balloon-retained catheters, the major complication rate was 0%, the minor complication rate was 8% (2/25 patients), and the tube complication rate was 68% (17/25 patients). The following complications occurred: catheter dislodgment (n = 17), superficial cellulitis (n = 1), and bleeding gastric ulcer (n = 1). In patients who received mushroom-retained catheters, the major complication rate was 0%, the minor complication rare was 3.6% (2/55 patients), and the tube complication rate was 3.6% (2/55 patients). The following complications occurred: superficial cellulitis (n = 2), tube occlusion (n = 1), and peristomal tube leakage (n = 1), No significant differences in major or minor complications were found between the gastrostomy procedures. Balloon-retained catheters had a significantly higher rate: of tube complications (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION. Compared with balloon-retained catheters, mushroom-retained gastrostomy catheters are significantly more durable, more secure, and less prone to tube dysfunction, Mushroom-retained catheters should be the preferred type of gastrostomy catheter to place in patients whenever possible.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 362
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Percutaneous radiologic, surgical endoscopic, and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy gastrojejunostomy: Comparative study and cost analysis
    Barkmeier, JM
    Trerotola, SO
    Wiebke, EA
    Sherman, S
    Harris, VJ
    Snidow, JJ
    Johnson, MS
    Rogers, WJ
    Zhou, XH
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1998, 21 (04) : 324 - 328
  • [2] PERCUTANEOUS GASTROSTOMY AND GASTROJEJUNOSTOMY - ADDITIONAL EXPERIENCE IN 519 PROCEDURES
    BELL, SD
    CARMODY, EA
    YEUNG, EY
    THURSTON, WA
    SIMONS, ME
    HO, CS
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1995, 194 (03) : 817 - 820
  • [3] Radiologic peroral gastrostomy
    Clark, JA
    Pugash, RA
    Pantalone, RR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 10 (07) : 927 - 932
  • [4] Percutaneous gastrostomy with fluoroscopic guidance: Single-center experience in 500 consecutive cancer patients
    de Baere, T
    Chapot, R
    Kuoch, V
    Chevallier, P
    Delille, JP
    Domenge, C
    Schwaab, G
    Roche, A
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1999, 210 (03) : 651 - 654
  • [5] Radiologic gastrostomy placement: Pigtail-versus mushroom-retained catheters
    Funaki, B
    Zaleski, GX
    Lorenz, J
    Menocci, PB
    Funaki, AN
    Rosenblum, JD
    Straus, C
    Leef, JA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 175 (02) : 375 - 379
  • [6] PERCUTANEOUS FEEDING GASTROSTOMY WITH THE SELDINGER TECHNIQUE - REVIEW OF 252 PATIENTS
    HALKIER, BK
    HO, CS
    YEE, ACN
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1989, 171 (02) : 359 - 362
  • [7] A METHOD FOR RADIOLOGIC-ASSISTED GASTROSTOMY WHEN PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY IS CONTRAINDICATED
    ROSENZWEIG, TB
    PALESTRANT, AM
    ESPLIN, CA
    GILSDORF, RB
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 168 (06) : 587 - 591
  • [8] PERCUTANEOUS GASTROSTOMY WITH GASTROPEXY - EXPERIENCE IN 125 PATIENTS
    SAINI, S
    MUELLER, PR
    GAA, J
    BRIGGS, SE
    HAHN, PF
    FORMAN, BH
    TUNG, GA
    SILVERMAN, SG
    LEE, MJ
    MORRISON, MC
    BROWN, AT
    FERRUCCI, JT
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 154 (05) : 1003 - 1006
  • [9] Radiologically guided placement of pull-type gastrostomy tubes
    Szymski, GX
    Albazzaz, AN
    Funaki, B
    Rosenblum, JD
    Hackworth, CA
    Zernich, BW
    Leef, JA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 (03) : 669 - 673
  • [10] Single-step dilation for large-bore percutaneous gastrostomy and gastrojejunostomy
    Trerotola, SO
    Shah, H
    Johnson, MS
    Namyslowski, J
    Moresco, K
    Patel, NH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1998, 9 (04) : 579 - 582