Gratifications of using Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, or Snapchat to follow brands: The moderating effect of social comparison, trust, tie strength, and network homophily on brand identification, brand engagement, brand commitment, and membership intention

被引:309
作者
Phua, Joe [1 ]
Jin, Seunga Venus [2 ]
Kim, Jihoon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Grady Coll Journalism & Mass Commun, 120 Hooper St, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Sejong Univ, Sch Business, Neungdong Ro 209,Gunja Dong, Seoul 05006, South Korea
关键词
Social media; Social networking sites (SNSs); Uses and gratifications theory (UGT); Brand community; Brand relationships; Social comparison; Tie strength; Network homophily; WORD-OF-MOUTH; MEDIA; COMMUNITY; BEHAVIOR; IMPACT; CREDIBILITY; INFORMATION; INTERNET; STUDENTS; SITES;
D O I
10.1016/j.tele.2016.06.004
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Applying uses and gratifications theory (UGT), this study examined consumers' use of one of four social networking sites (SNSs): Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, or Snapchat, for following brands, and their influence on brand community-related outcomes. Results (N=297) indicated Snapchat users scored highest for passing time, sharing problems, and improving social knowledge, while Instagram users scored highest for showing affection, following fashion, and demonstrating sociability. Twitter users had highest brand community identification and membership intention, while Instagram users had highest brand community engagement and commitment. Attention to social comparison, SNS trust, tie strength, and homophily also significantly moderated the relationship between frequent use of each SNS to follow brands, and brand community-related outcomes. Implications for future research on SNS users' goal-directed consumption behaviors are discussed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:412 / 424
页数:13
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   The social influence of brand community: Evidence from European car clubs [J].
Algesheimer, R ;
Dholakia, UM ;
Herrmann, A .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2005, 69 (03) :19-34
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, LEAD SOC NETW WORLDW
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Media effects: Advances in theory and research
[4]   ATTENTION TO SOCIAL-COMPARISON INFORMATION - AN INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCE FACTOR AFFECTING CONSUMER CONFORMITY [J].
BEARDEN, WO ;
ROSE, RL .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1990, 16 (04) :461-471
[5]  
Boyd D., 2008, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, V13, P210, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1083-6101.2007.00393.X, 10.1016/j.physa.2011.12.021]
[6]   SOCIAL TIES AND WORD-OF-MOUTH REFERRAL BEHAVIOR [J].
BROWN, JJ ;
REINGEN, PH .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1987, 14 (03) :350-362
[7]   Social versus psychological brand community: The role of psychological sense of brand community [J].
Carlson, Brad D. ;
Suter, Tracy A. ;
Brown, Tom J. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2008, 61 (04) :284-291
[8]   Social comparison, imitation of celebrity models and materialism among Chinese youth [J].
Chan, Kara ;
Prendergast, Gerard P. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2008, 27 (05) :799-826
[9]   Drivers of new product recommending and referral behaviour on social network sites [J].
Chatterjee, Patrali .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2011, 30 (01) :77-101
[10]  
Chi H., 2011, J INTERACTIVE ADVERT, V12, P44, DOI DOI 10.1080/15252019.2011.10722190