Cost-effectiveness in Italy of preventive treatment with ramipril in patients at high risk of cardiovascular events

被引:9
作者
Capri, S
Perlini, S
机构
[1] Univ Cattaneo, LIUC, CREMS, Ctr Res Hlth Econ & Management, I-21053 Castellanza, VA, Italy
[2] Univ Pavia, IRCCS San Matteo, Dipartimento Med Interna & Terapia Med, Clin Med 2, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
关键词
ACE inhibitor; cardiovascular diseases; cost-effectiveness analysis; costs; ramipril;
D O I
10.1185/030079905x46331
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives:A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted in Italy of preventive treatment with ramipril (an angiotensin converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitor) compared to no treatment in patients at high risk of cardiovascular death. The analysis was based on data extracted from the HOPE trial. Methods: The current life table method was used in order to model a lifetime time horizon for outcomes and costs. The cohorts used were 1000 subjects on ramipril, and 1000 subjects on placebo enrolled in the HOPE trial. Kaplan-Meier curves at 5 years of the clinical study were fitted using an exponential model over a lifetime horizon, the outcome variables being myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization and death. Total direct medical costs have been considered from a third-party payer's perspective - the Italian National Health Service. Resources involved in each event/activity were estimated using the modified Delphi technique with a panel of six clinicians. Types of resources reported included drug therapies, laboratory and imaging tests, physician visits, outpatient and inpatient rehabilitation, as well as medical and surgical hospital admissions. The incremental cost per life year gained was the main measure of the analysis. Results: ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio) decreases with the length of the treatment period. After the first year the ICER is 55062euro and subsequently decreases to about 12770euro at 5 years, 5945euro at 10 years and 3726euro at 20 years. The two ways sensitivity analysis showed that at 5 years ICERs range from a saving of 4059euro to a cost of 22929euro (at 20 years they are 61814 and 4434euro), mainly depending on the cost of drug and cost of events. Previous analyses in other countries based on the HOPE study obtained ICER values which are comparable with our results, when taking into account the different cost structure of the health care systems. Conclusions: On the basis of these results, the use of ramipril is likely to represent an efficient use of public health expenditure in the Italian healthcare system.
引用
收藏
页码:913 / 921
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
*AM HEART ASS, 2003, HEART DIS STROK STAT
[2]   The cost-effectiveness of ramipril in the treatment of patients at high risk of cardiovascular events:: a Swedish sub-study to the HOPE study [J].
Björholt, I ;
Andersson, FL ;
Kahan, T ;
Östergren, J .
JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 251 (06) :508-517
[3]   UNCERTAINTY IN THE ECONOMIC-EVALUATION OF HEALTH-CARE TECHNOLOGIES - THE ROLE OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS [J].
BRIGGS, A ;
SCULPHER, M ;
BUXTON, M .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1994, 3 (02) :95-104
[4]   Methods in health service research - Handling uncertainty in economic evaluations of healthcare interventions [J].
Briggs, AH ;
Gray, AM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7210) :635-638
[5]  
Buxton MJ, 1997, HEALTH ECON, V6, P217, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199705)6:3<217::AID-HEC267>3.3.CO
[6]  
2-N
[7]   Assessment of the effect of ramipril therapy on direct health care costs for first and recurrent strokes in high-risk cardiovascular patients using data from the heart outcomes prevention evaluation (HOPE) study [J].
Carroll, CA ;
Coen, MM ;
Rymer, MM .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2003, 25 (04) :1248-1261
[8]  
Fox KM, 2003, LANCET, V362, P782
[9]  
Hart W M, 2002, An Med Interna, V19, P515
[10]  
*INF FARM, 2004, AGG GIUGN 2004