Identifying subassemblies and understanding their functions during a design review in immersive and non-immersive virtual environments

被引:10
作者
Lukacevic, Fanika [1 ]
Skec, Stanko [1 ,2 ]
Torlind, Peter [3 ]
Storga, Mario [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zagreb, Fac Mech Engn & Naval Architecture, Ivana Lucica 5, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
[2] Tech Univ Denmark, DTU Management, Lyngby, Denmark
[3] Lulea Univ Technol, Dept Business Adm Technol & Social Sci, Lulea, Sweden
关键词
design review; virtual environment; virtual reality; mechanism; function; HUMAN-FACTORS ISSUES; REALITY; USER;
D O I
10.1007/s42524-020-0099-z
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Design review (DR) is a product development (PD) activity used to inspect the technical characteristics of a design solution. Immersive virtual reality (IVR) technology enables the presentation of spatial information and interaction with 3D CAD models inside an immersive virtual environment (IVE). Such capabilities have shown the potential to mitigate the cognitive load needed for the visual perception of spatial information and, consequently, enhance design understanding and DR performance. Thus, an increasing number of studies have explored the effect of IVR technology on DR activities in different domains. However, determining when the implementation of IVR technology rather than a conventional user interface for DRs in mechanical engineering PD projects will be beneficial remains unclear. Hence, a conceptual DR experimental study was conducted to investigate the differences in the ability of engineering students to identify mechanisms and understand their functions when a design solution for a technical system is presented in an IVE by IVR technology and in a non-immersive virtual environment (nIVE) by a conventional user interface (monitor display, keyboard, and mouse). Data were collected by performing DR tasks and having participants complete a prior experience questionnaire, presence questionnaire, and mental rotations test. Findings of the study indicate that IVR does not support an enhanced ability of engineering students to identify mechanisms and understand their functions compared with a conventional user interface.
引用
收藏
页码:412 / 428
页数:17
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, IGROUP PRESENCE QUES
[2]  
Aust M., 2011, P ASME 2011 INT DES, V2, P1463
[3]  
Banerjee P., 2002, J COMPUT INF SCI ENG, V2, P59, DOI [10.1115/1.1486218, 10.1115/ 1.1486218, DOI 10.1115/1.1486218]
[4]   The Impact of Immersive Virtual Reality on Visualisation for a Design Review in Construction [J].
Bassanino, May ;
Wu, Kuo-Cheng ;
Yao, Jialiang ;
Khosrowshahi, Farzad ;
Fernando, Terrence ;
Skjrbaek, Jens .
2010 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE INFORMATION VISUALISATION (IV 2010), 2010, :585-589
[5]   An Industry Case Study: Investigating Early Design Decision Making in Virtual Reality [J].
Berg, Leif P. ;
Vance, Judy M. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING, 2017, 17 (01)
[6]  
Casenave L., 2017, P ASME 2017 INT DES, DOI [10.1115/DETC2017-67878, DOI 10.1115/DETC2017-67878]
[7]   The evolution, challenges, and future of knowledge representation in product design systems [J].
Chandrasegaran, Senthil K. ;
Ramani, Karthik ;
Sriram, Ram D. ;
Horvath, Imre ;
Bernard, Alain ;
Harik, Ramy F. ;
Gao, Wei .
COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN, 2013, 45 (02) :204-228
[8]   Neural Mechanisms of Attentional Reorienting in Three-Dimensional Space [J].
Chen, Qi ;
Weidner, Ralph ;
Vossel, Simone ;
Weiss, Peter H. ;
Fink, Gereon R. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 32 (39) :13352-13362
[9]  
Chu CCP, 1998, IIE TRANS, V30, P629, DOI 10.1080/07408179808966507
[10]   A Review of the Capabilities of Current Low-Cost Virtual Reality Technology and Its Potential to Enhance the Design Process [J].
Coburn, Joshua Q. ;
Freeman, Ian ;
Salmon, John L. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING, 2017, 17 (03)