What influences satisfaction and loyalty in public transport? A review of the literature

被引:266
作者
van Lierop, Dea [1 ]
Badami, Madhav G. [1 ,2 ]
El-Geneidy, Ahmed M. [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Sch Urban Planning, Room 400,Macdonald Harrington Bldg, Montreal, PQ H3A 0C2, Canada
[2] McGill Sch Environm, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Public transport; satisfaction; loyalty; service factors; ridership retention; literature review; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; SERVICE QUALITY; USER; EXPERIENCE; EMOTIONS; RAIL;
D O I
10.1080/01441647.2017.1298683
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Public transport ridership retention is a challenge for many cities. To develop comprehensive strategies aimed at retaining riders, it is necessary to understand the aspects of public transport that influence users to become loyal to the system. This paper analyses relevant literature regarding the causes of satisfaction and loyalty in public transport. We find that the service factors most associated with satisfaction are on-board cleanliness and comfort, courteous and helpful behaviour from operators, safety, as well as punctuality and frequency of service. On the other hand, loyalty is associated with users' perceptions of value-for-money, on-board safety and cleanliness, interactions with personnel and the image and commitment to public transport that users feels. Furthermore, the results elucidate that the concept of loyalty is best defined based on users' intentions to continue using the service, their willingness to recommend it to others, their overall satisfaction, but also and most importantly, their image of and involvement with public transport. Public transport users who have a positive image of the agency and consider public transport an integral component of city life are more likely to demonstrate loyalty and act like ambassadors for public transport agencies.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 72
页数:21
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Allen D., 2004, Customer Satisfaction Research Management: a comprehensive guide to integrating customer loyalty and satisfaction metrics
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, WORLD HLTH ORG
[3]  
Barlow S., 2006, FINDINGS CUSTOMER SU, VI
[4]  
Bloemer J., 1998, International Journal of Bank Marketing, V16, P276, DOI [DOI 10.1108/02652329810245984, 10.1108/02652329810245984]
[5]  
Burkhardt JE, 2003, TRANSPORT RES REC, P84
[6]   Understanding the travel experience and its impact on attitudes, emotions and loyalty towards the transportation provider-A quantitative study with mid-distance bus trips [J].
Carreira, Rui ;
Patricio, Lia ;
Jorge, Renato Natal ;
Magee, Chris .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2014, 31 :35-46
[7]   Does service reliability determine transit patronage? Insights from the Los Angeles Metro bus system [J].
Chakrabarti, Sandip ;
Giuliano, Genevieve .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2015, 42 :12-20
[8]   A structural equation analysis of the QSL relationship with passenger riding experience on high speed rail: An empirical study of Taiwan and Korea [J].
Chou, Jui-Sheng ;
Kim, Changwan .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (03) :6945-6955
[9]   Rail passenger crowding, stress, health and safety in Britain [J].
Cox, T ;
Houdmont, J ;
Griffiths, A .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2006, 40 (03) :244-258
[10]  
Das AM, 2013, J ENG SCI TECHNOL, V8, P272