Efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal from root canals

被引:94
作者
Gu, L. -S. [1 ]
Ling, J. -Q [1 ]
Wei, X. [1 ]
Huang, X. -Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Guanghua Coll Stomatol, Dept Operat Dent & Endodont, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
endodontic retreatment; gutta-percha; nickel-titanium; ProTaper Universal rotary instruments;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01350.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim To evaluate the efficacy of the ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha (GP) removal from root canals. Methodology Root canals of 60 extracted human maxillary anterior teeth were prepared and filled with laterally condensed GP and AH Plus sealer. Teeth were divided into three groups: group A - GP removal completed with the ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment system and with further canal repreparation accomplished with ProTaper Universal rotary instruments; group B - GP removal was completed using Gates Glidden drills and Hedstrom files with chloroform as a solvent, followed with further canal repreparation with ProTaper Universal rotary instruments; group C - the same as group B for GP removal with further canal preparation with stainless steel K-flex files (Kerr). The operating time was recorded. Teeth were rendered transparent for the evaluation of the area of remaining GP/sealer in bucco-lingual and mesial-distal directions. Statistical analysis was performed by using repeated measures analysis of variance and ANOVA. Results The ProTaper Universal technique (group A) resulted in a smaller percentage of canal area covered by residual GP/sealer than in groups B and C, with a significant difference between groups A and C (P < 0.05). Mean operating time for group A was 6.73 min, which was significantly shorter (P < 0.05) than group B (10.86 min) and group C (13.52 min). Conclusions In this laboratory study all test techniques left GP/sealer remnants within the root canal. The ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment system proved to be an efficient method of removing GP and sealer from maxillary anterior teeth.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 295
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Shaping ability of ProFile and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments when used in a variable tip sequence in simulated curved root canals [J].
Ayar, LR ;
Love, RM .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2004, 37 (09) :593-601
[2]   Gutta-percha retreatment: Effectiveness of nickel-titanium rotary instruments versus stainless steel hand files [J].
Barrieshi-Nusair, KM .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2002, 28 (06) :454-456
[3]   Quantec SC rotary instruments versus hand files for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment [J].
Betti, LV ;
Bramante, CM .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2001, 34 (07) :514-519
[4]   The efficacy of gutta-percha removal using ProFiles [J].
Ferreira, JJ ;
Rhodes, JS ;
Ford, TRP .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2001, 34 (04) :267-274
[5]  
FILHO FB, 2002, INT ENDOD J, V35, P651
[6]   ENDODONTIC RETREATMENT - CASE SELECTION AND TECHNIQUE .3. RETREATMENT TECHNIQUES [J].
FRIEDMAN, S ;
STABHOLZ, A ;
TAMSE, A .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1990, 16 (11) :543-549
[7]   Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation [J].
Guelzow, A ;
Stamm, O ;
Martus, P ;
Kielbassa, AM .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2005, 38 (10) :743-752
[8]   Efficacy, cleaning ability and safety of different rotary NiTi instruments in root canal retreatment [J].
Hülsmann, M ;
Bluhm, V .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2004, 37 (07) :468-476
[9]  
Hulsmann M, 1997, INT ENDOD J, V30, P227
[10]   A comparison of the relative efficacies of four hand and rotary instrumentation techniques during endodontic retreatment [J].
Imura, N ;
Kato, AS ;
Hata, GI ;
Uemura, M ;
Toda, T ;
Weine, F .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2000, 33 (04) :361-366