Shear stress transfer across concrete-to-concrete interfaces: Experimental evidence and available strength models

被引:0
作者
Davaadorj, Otgonchimeg [1 ]
Calvi, Paolo M. [2 ]
Stanton, John F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Struct Engn, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源
PCI JOURNAL | 2020年 / 65卷 / 04期
关键词
Concrete joints; concrete-to-concrete interface; interface shear; shear friction; shear strength; REINFORCED-CONCRETE; AGGREGATE CONCRETE; HORIZONTAL SHEAR; FRICTION; CAPACITY; PRECAST; CRACKS; TESTS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper presents results of a database of interface shear experiments collected from the literature and analyzed to identify the main parameters affecting the strength of concrete-to-concrete interfaces subjected to shear loads and to gauge the reliability of major international codes and interface strength models. The database included 509 push-off and pull-off specimens, with steel reinforcement normal to the interface and subjected to monotonic pure shear loading. The experimental data were analyzed mainly in terms of interface type, clamping stress, concrete compressive strength, concrete unit weight, and steel strength. The analysis of the database revealed that clamping stress and interface type were the main parameters influencing the interface strength but that the concrete strength could play an important role as well. In contrast, it was found that the concrete unit weight appeared to have no effect on the interface strength. Of the code provisions considered, it was found that the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials' AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications shear friction equations were the most accurate at predicting the interface strength for all interface types and conditions, while the PCI Design Handbook: Precast and Prestressed Concrete and American Concrete Institute's Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14) equations tended to underestimate the strength, with the PCI Design Handbook being generally more accurate than ACI 318-14.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 111
页数:25
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1974, Concrete Technology Association (CTA), CTA, V35, P271
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2007, AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications, V4th
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2014, BUILDING CODE REQUIR
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1976, Concrete Technology Association (CTA), CTA, V36, P317
  • [5] Effect of High-Strength Reinforcement Steel on Shear Friction Behavior
    Barbosa, Andre R.
    Trejo, David
    Nielson, Drew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2017, 22 (08)
  • [6] BASS RA, 1989, ACI STRUCT J, V86, P383
  • [7] Birkeland P.W., 1966, ACI J, V63, P345
  • [8] Pure Mechanics Crack Model for Shear Stress Transfer in Cracked Reinforced Concrete
    Calvi, Paolo M.
    Bentz, Evan C.
    Collins, Michael P.
    [J]. ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL, 2017, 114 (02) : 545 - 554
  • [9] Reversed Cyclic Experiments on Shear Stress Transfer across Cracks in Reinforced Concrete Elements
    Calvi, Paolo M.
    Bentz, Evan C.
    Collins, Michael P.
    [J]. ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL, 2016, 113 (04) : 851 - 859
  • [10] Canadian Standards Association (CSA) Technical Committee on Reinforced Concrete Design, 2014, A23304 CSA