Exterior RC joints subjected to monotonic and cyclic loading

被引:11
作者
Murad, Yasmin [1 ]
Abdel-Jabar, Haneen [1 ]
Diab, Amjad [1 ]
Abu Hajar, Husam [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jordan, Dept Civil Engn, Amman, Jordan
关键词
Cyclic loading; Gene expression programming; ACI; Joint shear strength; Monotonic loading; BEAM-COLUMN JOINTS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; PREDICTIVE MODEL; SHEAR-STRENGTH; CONCRETE; BEHAVIOR; DESIGN; CONNECTIONS; SUBASSEMBLAGES;
D O I
10.1108/EC-06-2019-0269
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this study is to develop two empirical models that predict the shear strength of exterior beam-column joints exposed to monotonic and cyclic loading using Gene expression programming (GEP). Design/methodology/approach The GEP model developed for the monotonic loading case is trained and validated using 81 data test points and that for cyclic loading case is trained and validated using 159 data test points that collected from different 9 and 39 experimental programs, respectively. The parameters that are selected to develop the cyclic GEP model are concrete compressive strength, joint aspect ratio, column axial load and joint transverse reinforcement. The monotonic GEP model is developed using concrete compressive strength, column depth, joint width and column axial load. Findings GEP models are proposed in this paper to predict the joint shear strength of beam-column joints under cyclic and monotonic loading. The predicted results obtained using the GEP models are compared to those calculated using the ACI-352 code formulations. A sensitivity analysis is also performed to further validate the GEP models. Originality/value The proposed GEP models provide an accurate prediction for joint shear strength of beam-column joints under cyclic and monotonic loading that is more fitting to the experimental database than the ACI-352 predictions where the GEP models have higher R-2 value than the code formulations.
引用
收藏
页码:2319 / 2336
页数:18
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
Alva G.M.S., 2004, THESIS U SAO PAULO, DOI [10.11606/T.18.2004.tde-17052006-150221., DOI 10.11606/T.18.2004.TDE-17052006-150221.]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, ACI352R02 ACIASCE CO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Tech. Rep . No., PEER 2002
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, 318 ACI
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Seismic behavior of beam-column joint subassemblies reinforced with steel fibers
[6]   Experimental investigation of FRP-strengthened RC beam-column joints [J].
Antonopoulos, CP ;
Triantafillou, TC .
JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2003, 7 (01) :39-49
[7]   Estimating Shear Strength of Short Rectangular Reinforced Concrete Columns Using Nonlinear Regression and Gene Expression Programming [J].
Aval, S. B. Beheshti ;
Ketabdari, H. ;
Gharebaghi, S. Asil .
STRUCTURES, 2017, 12 :13-23
[8]  
Beres A., 1996, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V12, P185, DOI DOI 10.1193/1.1585876
[9]   Behavior of Damaged Exterior RC Beam-Column Joints Strengthened by CFRP Composites [J].
Beydokhty, Ebrahim Zamani ;
Shariatmadar, Hashem .
LATIN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2016, 13 (05) :880-896
[10]  
Bindhu K.R., 2009, J EARTHQUAKE TECHNOL