Utility of the Boston Naming Test in predicting ultimate side of surgery in patients with medically intractable temporal lobe epilepsy

Purpose: Confrontation naming tasks have long been presumed to be sensitive to left temporal dysfunction and, consequently, are frequently used in the evaluation of surgical epilepsy patients. Despite wide and frequent use, few studies have examined the utility of confrontation naming tasks in individuals with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). Methods: The current study examined the presurgical Boston Naming Test (BNT) performance of 217 right-handed adult patients with intractable TLE (left, 108; right, 109) to determine the utility of this measure in predicting ultimate side of surgery. Results: The results support the clinical utility of the BNT in determining ultimate side of surgery and suggest that the BNT has incremental validity over and above presurgical delayed memory and intelligence scores. This relation was found to be moderated by Full Scale IQ (FSIQ), age at seizure onset, and duration of epilepsy. The use of a logistic regression equation to predict side of surgery revealed that prediction of left temporal surgery was best among patients with low BNT scores, high FSIQs, and late age at seizure onset. In contrast, right temporal surgery was best predicted among patients with high BNT scores, low FSIQs, and short duration of epilepsy. Conclusions: This study supports the clinical utility of the BNT in the preoperative evaluation of candidates for TLE surgery and highlights the importance of examining potential moderating variables when making predictions about side of surgery. This study further provides clinicians with a regression equation that can be used to predict side of surgery in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy.