Appearance of Deflux® implants with magnetic resonance imaging after endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children

被引:8
作者
Cerwinka, Wolfgang H. [1 ]
Grattan-Smith, J. Damien [2 ]
Scherz, Hal C. [1 ]
Kirsch, Andrew J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Healthcare Atlanta, Pediat Urol, Atlanta, GA USA
[2] Childrens Healthcare Atlanta, Pediat Radiol, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
Vesicoureteral reflux; Endoscopic injection; Magnetic resonance imaging;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpurol.2008.10.005
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective: With the increasing popularity of endoscopic treatment for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children, dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Deftux (R)) implants are more frequently detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Such findings on MRI may be misinterpreted and lead to unnecessary intervention. The objective of this study was to characterize the appearance of Deux implants on MRI. Materials and methods: Between July 2001 and November 2007, hospital charts of patients with a history of Deflux (R) injection for VUR were evaluated to identify those who had subsequent MRI studies. The indications were determined, and the appearance of Deflux (R) implants analyzed and compared to findings on ultrasound, voiding cystourethrography and kidney ureter bladder radiography. Results: Of 893 patients who underwent endoscopic treatment for VUR, subsequently 16 patients (1.8%) had MRI scans. Twenty-seven Deflux (R) implants were identified on MRI as bright structures on T2-weighted sequences only. Neither T1-weighted images nor excretory MR urography visualized the Deflux (R) implants, which did not enhance with gadolinium. Deflux (R) was not detected by kidney ureter bladder radiography; however, voiding cystourethrography and more reliably ultrasound could identify implants. Conclusions: Deflux (R) implants appear on MRI as bright structures on 12-weighted sequences. History of VUR/VUR treatment and the presence of a single urinary system should provide reassurance and prevent inappropriate intervention for misdiagnosed ureteroceles. (C) 2008 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 118
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Obstructive suburethral mass after transurethral injection of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer [J].
Abdelwahab, Hassan A. ;
Ghoniem, Gamal M. .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2007, 18 (11) :1379-1380
[2]   Magnetic resonance imaging after intraurethral collagen injected for stress urinary incontinence [J].
Carr, LK ;
Herschorn, S ;
Leonhardt, C .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 155 (04) :1253-1255
[3]   Periurethral granuloma following injection with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer for stress urinary incontinence [J].
Castillo-Vico, Maria-Teresa ;
Checa-Vizcaino, Miguel A. ;
Paya-Panades, Antonio ;
Rueda-Garcia, Carolina ;
Carreras-Collado, Ramon .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2007, 18 (01) :95-97
[4]  
CERWINKA WH, J UROL IN PRESS
[5]   Magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate NASHA/Dx gel (Zuidex™) for stress urinary incontinence [J].
Fianu-Jonasson, A. ;
Edwall, L. ;
Wiberg, M. Kristoffersen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2006, 60 (10) :1181-1186
[6]   MR urography in children: how we do it [J].
Grattan-Smith, J. Damien ;
Little, Stephen B. ;
Jones, Richard A. .
PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2008, 38 (Suppl 1) :S3-S17
[7]  
Kirsch AJ, 2006, ANN AUA M ATL GEORG
[8]   MR APPEARANCE OF SUBURETERIC INJECTION OF TEFLON TO CORRECT VESICOURETERAL REFLUX [J].
KIRSCH, MD ;
DONALDSON, JS ;
KAPLAN, WE .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1990, 14 (04) :673-674
[9]   Injected periurethral collagen for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence: MR and CT appearance [J].
Maki, DD ;
Banner, MP ;
Ramchandani, P ;
Stolpen, A ;
Rovner, ES ;
Wein, AJ .
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2000, 25 (06) :658-662
[10]   Long-term preservation of dextranolrner/hyaluronic acid copolymer implants after endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children: A sonographic volumetric analysis [J].
McMann, Leah P. ;
Scherz, Hal C. ;
Kirsch, Andrew J. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (01) :316-320