Process analysis of CO2 capture from flue gas using carbonation/calcination cycles

被引:78
作者
Li Zhen-shan [1 ]
Cai Ning-sheng [1 ]
Croiset, Eric [2 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Thermal Engn, Key Lab Thermal Sci & Power Engn MOE, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Waterloo, Dept Chem Engn, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1002/aic.11486
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Process analysis Of CO2 capture from flue gas using Ca-based carbonation/calcination cycles is presented here. A carbonation/calcination system is composed essentially of two reactors (an absorber and a regenerator) with Ca-based sorbent circulating between the two reactors (assumed here as fluidized beds). CO2 is, therefore, transferred from the absorber to the regenerator. Because of the endothermicity of the calcination reaction, a certain amount of coal is burned with pure oxygen in the regenerator. Detailed mass balance, heat balance and cost of electricity and CO2 mitigation for the carbonation/calcination cycles with three Ca-based sorbents in dual fluidized beds were calculated and analyzed to study the effect of the Ca-based sorbent activity decay on CO2 capture from flue gas. The three sorbents considered were: limestone, dolomite and CaO/Ca12Al14O33 (75/25 wt %) sorbent. All results, including the amount of coal and oxygen required, are presented with respect to the difference in calcium oxide conversion between the absorber and the regenerator, which is an important design parameter. Finally, costs of electricity and CO2 mitigation costs using carbonation/calcination cycles for the three sorbents were estimated. The results indicate that the economics of the carbonation/calcination process compare favorably with competing technologies for capturing CO2. (C) 2008 American Institute of Chemical Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:1912 / 1925
页数:14
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Cost structure of a postcombustion CO2 capture system using CaO [J].
Abanades, J. Carlos ;
Grasa, G. ;
Alonso, M. ;
Rodriguez, N. ;
Anthony, E. J. ;
Romeo, L. M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 41 (15) :5523-5527
[2]   Conversion limits in the reaction of CO2 with lime [J].
Abanades, JC ;
Alvarez, D .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2003, 17 (02) :308-315
[3]   Sorbent cost and performance in CO2 capture systems [J].
Abanades, JC ;
Rubin, ES ;
Anthony, EJ .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2004, 43 (13) :3462-3466
[4]   Fluidized bed combustion systems integrating CO2 capture with CaO [J].
Abanades, JC ;
Anthony, EJ ;
Wang, JS ;
Oakey, JE .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 39 (08) :2861-2866
[5]   The maximum capture efficiency of CO2 using a carbonation/calcination cycle of CaO/CaCO3 [J].
Abanades, JC .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2002, 90 (03) :303-306
[6]   Process evaluation of an 865 MWe lignite fired O2/CO2 power plant [J].
Andersson, Klas ;
Johnsson, Filip .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 47 (18-19) :3487-3498
[7]  
[Anonymous], ADV CHEM SER
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
[9]   Hydrogen from methane in a single-step process [J].
Balasubramanian, B ;
Ortiz, AL ;
Kaytakoglu, S ;
Harrison, DP .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1999, 54 (15-16) :3543-3552
[10]  
Barin I., 2008, Thermochemical Data of Pure Substances, VThird