Transboundary crisis management under the volcano: The case of the Icelandic ash cloud

被引:6
|
作者
Bravo-Laguna, Carlos [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Barcelona Estudis Int IBEI, Carrer Ramon Trias Fargas 25-27, Barcelona 08005, Spain
[2] Univ Pompeu Fabra UPF, Dept Polit & Social Sci, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
crisis management; European integration; networks; EUROPEAN INTEGRATION; NATION-STATE; GOVERNANCE; NETWORK; COMMUNICATION; AVIATION; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1111/1468-5973.12303
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper discusses the intricacies of external transboundary crises, namely those cross-border threats whose management requires coordination among EU and non-EU countries. Specifically, it explores the extent to which European integration theories shed light on the coordination of external transboundary crisis responses by assessing the weight and role of the actor constellations involved in the civil aviation response to the 2010 Icelandic ash cloud crisis. The use of social network analysis as a methodological tool generates novel empirical evidence on the configuration of crisis management structures. The analysis shows that many EU Member States led decision-making, whereas supranational organizations were instrumental in the coordination of the ash cloud crisis response. The centrality of these bodies contrasts with the peripheral position of most interest groups. This paper also suggests that external transboundary crises present complex management dynamics that distinguish them from generic transboundary threats. For example, the response to the ash cloud crisis was not commanded by the European Economic Area/European Free Trade Association countries where its epicentre was located. The empirical analysis was based on information extracted from a survey to experts involved in the management of this episode, as well as from ten semi-structured elite interviews.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 88
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Crisis management from a relational perspective: an analysis of interorganizational transboundary crisis networks
    Bravo-Laguna, Carlos
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC POLICY, 2024,
  • [2] Crisis management in Europe: exploring transgovernmental solutions to transboundary problems
    Hollis S.
    Journal of Transatlantic Studies, 2020, 18 (2) : 231 - 252
  • [3] DESIGNING RESILIENT INSTITUTIONS FOR TRANSBOUNDARY CRISIS MANAGEMENT: A TIME FOR PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
    Boin, Arjen
    Lodge, Martin
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2016, 94 (02) : 289 - 298
  • [4] Discursive Strategies for Crisis Management:A Case Study of the Johnson & Johnson TYLENOL? Crisis
    张一然
    海外英语, 2016, (11) : 235 - 238
  • [5] The 2015 eruption of Gamalama volcano (Ternate Island-Indonesia): precursor, crisis management, and community response
    Hidayat, Agung
    Marfai, Muh Aris
    Hadmoko, Danang Sri
    GEOJOURNAL, 2022, 87 (01) : 1 - 20
  • [6] MANAGEMENT OF THE ENTERPRISE UNDER CONDITIONS OF CRISIS
    Grznar, Miroslav
    Szabo, Luboslav
    Kralovic, Jozef
    FINANCE AND THE PERFORMANCE OF FIRMS IN SCIENCE, EDUCATION, AND PRACTICE, 2011, : 130 - 139
  • [7] Volcano disaster risk management during crisis: implementation of risk communication in Indonesia
    Andreastuti S.D.
    Paripurno E.T.
    Subandriyo S.
    Syahbana D.K.
    Prayoga A.S.
    Journal of Applied Volcanology, 12 (1)
  • [8] Governance structure affects transboundary disease management under alternative objectives
    Julie C. Blackwood
    Mykhaylo M. Malakhov
    Junyan Duan
    Jordan J. Pellett
    Ishan S. Phadke
    Suzanne Lenhart
    Charles Sims
    Katriona Shea
    BMC Public Health, 21
  • [9] Governance structure affects transboundary disease management under alternative objectives
    Blackwood, Julie C.
    Malakhov, Mykhaylo M.
    Duan, Junyan
    Pellett, Jordan J.
    Phadke, Ishan S.
    Lenhart, Suzanne
    Sims, Charles
    Shea, Katriona
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [10] On Frontline Workers as Bureau-Political Actors: The Case of Civil-Military Crisis Management
    Kalkman, Jori Pascal
    Groenewegen, Peter
    ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, 2019, 51 (07) : 1148 - 1170