Systematic Review and Cumulative Analysis of Oncologic and Functional Outcomes After Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy

被引:184
作者
Yuh, Bertram [1 ]
Wilson, Timothy [1 ]
Bochner, Bernie [2 ]
Chan, Kevin [1 ]
Palou, Joan [3 ]
Stenzl, Arnulf [4 ]
Montorsi, Francesco [5 ]
Thalmann, George [6 ]
Guru, Khurshid [7 ]
Catto, James W. F. [8 ]
Wiklund, Peter N. [9 ]
Novara, Giacomo [10 ]
机构
[1] City Hope Natl Canc Ctr, Duarte, CA 91010 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Urol Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Fundacio Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Univ Tubingen, Dept Urol, Tubingen, Germany
[5] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Dept Urol, Milan, Italy
[6] Univ Bern, Dept Urol, Bern, Switzerland
[7] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Dept Urol, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[8] Univ Sheffield, Acad Urol Unit, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[9] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Stockholm, Sweden
[10] Univ Padua, Dept Surg Oncol & Gastroenterol, Urol Clin, Padua, Italy
关键词
Radical cystectomy; Robotics; Robotic radical cystectomy; Laparoscopic radical cystectomy; INVASIVE BLADDER-CANCER; INTRACORPOREAL URINARY-DIVERSION; EXTENDED PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY; TRANSITIONAL-CELL CARCINOMA; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; BODY-MASS INDEX; MEAN FOLLOW-UP; INITIAL-EXPERIENCE; UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA; ILEAL CONDUIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context: Although open radical cystectomy (ORC) is still the standard approach, laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) and robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) are increasingly performed. Objective: To report on a systematic literature review and cumulative analysis of pathologic, oncologic, and functional outcomes of RARC in comparison with ORC and LRC. Evidence acquisition: Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched using a free-text protocol including the terms robot-assisted radical cystectomy or da Vinci radical cystectomy or robot* radical cystectomy. RARC case series and studies comparing RARC with either ORC or LRC were collected. A cumulative analysis was conducted. Evidence synthesis: The searches retrieved 105 papers, 87 of which reported on pathologic, oncologic, or functional outcomes. Most series were retrospective and had small case numbers, short follow-up, and potential patient selection bias. The lymph node yield during lymph node dissection was 19 (range: 3-55), with half of the series following an extended template (yield range: 11-55). The lymph node-positive rate was 22%. The performance of lymphadenectomy was correlated with surgeon and institutional volume. Cumulative analyses showed no significant difference in lymph node yield between RARC and ORC. Positive surgical margin (PSM) rates were 5.6% (1-1.5% in pT2 disease and 0-25% in pT3 and higher disease). PSM rates did not appear to decrease with sequential case numbers. Cumulative analyses showed no significant difference in rates of surgical margins between RARC and ORC or RARC and LRC. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy use ranged from 0% to 31%, with adjuvant chemotherapy used in 4-29% of patients. Only six series reported a mean follow-up of > 36 mo. Three-year disease-free survival (DFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) rates were 67-76%, 68-83%, and 61-80%, respectively. The 5-yr DFS, CSS, and OS rates were 53-74%, 66-80%, and 39-66%, respectively. Similar to ORC, disease of higher pathologic stage or evidence of lymph node involvement was associated with worse survival. Very limited data were available with respect to functional outcomes. The 12-mo continence rates with continent diversion were 83-100% in men for daytime continence and 66-76% for nighttime continence. In one series, potency was recovered in 63% of patients who were evaluable at 12 mo. Conclusions: Oncologic and functional data from RARC remain immature, and longer-term prospective studies are needed. Cumulative analyses demonstrated that lymph node yields and PSM rates were similar between RARC and ORC. Conclusive long-term survival outcomes for RARC were limited, although oncologic outcomes up to 5 yr were similar to those reported for ORC. Patient summary: Although open radical cystectomy (RC) is still regarded as the standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer, laparoscopic and robot-assisted RCs are becoming more popular. Templates of lymph node dissection, lymph node yields, and positive surgical margin rates are acceptable with robot-assisted RC. Although definitive comparisons with open RC with respect to oncologic or functional outcomes are lacking, early results appear comparable. (C) 2014 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:402 / 422
页数:21
相关论文
共 102 条
[1]   Quality of Lymphadenectomy is Equivalent With Robotic and Open Cystectomy Using an Extended Template [J].
Abaza, Ronney ;
Dangle, Pankaj P. ;
Gong, Michael C. ;
Bahnson, Robert R. ;
Pohar, Kamal S. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04) :1200-1204
[2]  
Abol-Enein H, 2003, LANCET, V361, P1927
[3]   Comparative analysis of laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical cystectomy with heal conduit urinary diversion [J].
Abraham, Jose Benito A. ;
Young, Jennifer L. ;
Box, Geoffrey N. ;
Lee, Hak J. ;
Deane, Leslie A. ;
Ornstein, David K. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 (12) :1473-1480
[4]   The First 100 Consecutive, Robot-assisted, Intracorporeal Ileal Conduits: Evolution of Technique and 90-day Outcomes [J].
Azzouni, Faris S. ;
Din, Rakeeba ;
Rehman, Shabnam ;
Khan, Aabroo ;
Shi, Yi ;
Stegemann, Andrew ;
Sharif, Mohammad ;
Wilding, Gregory E. ;
Guru, Khurshid A. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 63 (04) :637-643
[5]   Prospectively packaged lymph node dissections with radical cystectomy: Evaluation of node count variability and node mapping [J].
Bochner, BH ;
Cho, D ;
Herr, HW ;
Donat, M ;
Kattan, MW ;
Dalbagni, G .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (04) :1286-1290
[6]  
Butt ZM, 2008, JSLS-J SOC LAPAROEND, V12, P241
[7]   Robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical cystectomy with bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) and intracorporeal urinary diversion for bladder cancer: initial experience in 27 cases [J].
Canda, Abdullah E. ;
Atmaca, Ali F. ;
Altinova, Serkan ;
Akbulut, Ziya ;
Balbay, Mevlana D. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (03) :434-444
[8]   A Comparison of Postoperative Complications in Open versus Robotic Cystectomy [J].
Casey, K. Ng ;
Kauffman, Eric C. ;
Lee, Ming-Ming ;
Otto, Brandon J. ;
Portnoff, Alyse ;
Ehrlich, Josh R. ;
Schwartz, Michael J. ;
Wang, Gerald J. ;
Scherr, Douglas S. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (02) :274-281
[9]   Our Experiences with Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: Orthotopic Neobladder by the Suprapubic Incision Method [J].
Cho, Byung Chul ;
Jung, Ha Bum ;
Cho, Sung Tae ;
Kim, Ki Kyung ;
Han, Jun Hyun ;
Lee, Yong Seong ;
Lee, Young Goo .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 53 (11) :766-773
[10]   Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy: Description of an Evolved Approach to Radical Cystectomy [J].
Collins, Justin W. ;
Tyritzis, Stavros ;
Nyberg, Tommy ;
Schumacher, Martin ;
Laurin, Oscar ;
Khazaeli, Dinyar ;
Adding, Christofer ;
Jonsson, Martin N. ;
Hosseini, Abolfazl ;
Wiklund, N. Peter .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 64 (04) :654-663