How many people should be in the urban forest? A comparison of trail preferences of Vienna and Sapporo forest visitor segments

被引:76
作者
Arnberger, Arne [1 ]
Aikoh, Tetsuya [2 ]
Eder, Renate [1 ]
Shoji, Yasushi [2 ]
Mieno, Taro [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nat Resources & Appl Life Sci Vienna, Inst Landscape Dev Recreat & Conservat Planning, A-1190 Vienna, Austria
[2] Hokkaido Univ, Res Fac Agr, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会; 奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
Crowding; Social stimulation; Stated choice; Trail use; Urban forest; CROSS-CULTURAL DIFFERENCES; OUTDOOR RECREATION; CROWDING NORMS; PERSPECTIVE; MANAGEMENT; PERCEPTION; CONFLICT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ufug.2010.01.002
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Differences in trail preferences for social conditions of visitors to forests in Vienna and Sapporo were investigated in 2006 using a standardised image-based stated choice approach. On-site visitors to two comparable pen-urban forests - the Lobau Forest in Vienna, Austria (n = 373), and the Nopporo Forest in Sapporo, Japan (n = 256) - evaluated the same sets of computer manipulated images depicting 128 trail scenarios with different levels of social stimulation. Latent class segmentations, in three sub-segments of similar sizes, differentiated by partly opposite preferences for social conditions, were derived for both samples. A positive contribution of social stimulation to preferences was found for about 17% of Nopporo and 9% of Lobau respondents, while for close to 50% of Lobau respondents and 38% of Nopporo respondents very low levels of social stimulation were preferred. The results indicate that urban forests should be managed for users with a desire for low social densities as well as a denser social setting providing some levels of social stimulation. (C) 2010 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 225
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Altman I., 1975, The Environment and Social Behavior
[2]  
Anderson M, 1997, USDA NE EXP, V241, P182
[3]   Crowding in European forests: a review of recent research and implications for forest management and policy [J].
Arnberger, Arne ;
Mann, Carsten .
FORESTRY, 2008, 81 (04) :559-571
[4]  
Arnberger Arne, 2005, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, V3, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2005.04.002
[5]  
Arnberger Arne, 2006, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, V4, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2006.01.004
[6]  
BAUM A, 1991, HDB ENV PSYCHOL, V1, P533
[7]  
Cessford Gordon, 2003, Journal for Nature Conservation (Jena), V11, P310, DOI 10.1078/1617-1381-00062
[8]   RECREATIONAL CONGESTION - SOME HYPOTHESES TESTED IN THE FOREST OF DEAN [J].
CHAMBERS, TWM ;
PRICE, C .
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 1986, 2 (01) :41-52
[9]  
Ditton R. B., 1983, Leisure Sciences, V5, P273, DOI 10.1080/01490408309513009
[10]   Cross-cultural differences in tolerance for crowding: Fact or fiction? [J].
Evans, GW ;
Lepore, SJ ;
Allen, KM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 79 (02) :204-210