A nomogram based on PI-RADS v2.1 and clinical indicators for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer in the transition zone

被引:15
作者
Wei, Chaogang [1 ,2 ]
Pan, Peng [1 ]
Chen, Tong [1 ,3 ]
Zhang, Yueyue [1 ]
Dai, Guangcheng [4 ]
Tu, Jian [5 ]
Jiang, Zhen [1 ]
Zhao, Wenlu [1 ]
Shen, Junkang [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Radiol, Suzhou 215004, Peoples R China
[2] Soochow Univ, State Key Lab Radiat Med & Protect, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Soochow Univ, Inst Radiat Oncol Therapeut, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Urol Surg, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Soochow Univ, Dept Pathol, Affiliated Hosp 2, Suzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS); prostate cancer; nomogram; transition zone (TZ); ANTIGEN DENSITY; PSA DENSITY; DIAGNOSIS; ACCURACY; BIOPSY; NG/ML; MEN; MRI;
D O I
10.21037/tau-21-49
中图分类号
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This study attempted to develop a nomogram for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer (cs-PCa) in the transition zone (TZ) with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS v2.1) score based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bp-MRI) and clinical indicators. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 383 patients with suspicious prostate lesions in the TZ as a training cohort and 128 patients as the validation cohort from January 2015 to March 2020. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine independent predictors for building a nomogram, and the performance of the nomogram was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), the calibration curve and decision curve. Results: The PI-RADS v2.1 score and prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) were independent predictors of TZ cs-PCa. The prediction model had a significantly higher AUC (0.936) than the individual predictors (0.914 for PI-RADS v2.1 score, P=0.045, 0.842 for PSAD, P<0.001). The nomogram showed good discrimination (AUC of 0.936 in the training cohort and 0.963 in the validation cohort) and favorable calibration. When the PI-RADS v2.1 score was combined with PSAD, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 80.7% and 93.8%, respectively, which were better than those of the PI-RADS v2.1 score (sensitivity, 74.2%; specificity, 92.5%) and PSAD (sensitivity, 66.1%; specificity, 88.2%). Conclusions: The newly constructed nomogram exhibits satisfactory predictive accuracy and consistency for TZ cs-PCa. PI-RADS v2.1 based on bp-MRI is a strong predictor in the detection of TZ cs-PCa. Adding PSAD to PI-RADS v2.1 could improve its diagnostic performance, thereby avoiding unnecessary biopsies.
引用
收藏
页码:2435 / 2446
页数:12
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Prostate volume is strongest predictor of cancer diagnosis at transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy with prostate-specific antigen values between 2.0 and 9.0 ng/ml
    Al-Azab, Rami
    Toi, Ants
    Lockwood, Gina
    Kulkarni, Girish S.
    Fleshner, Neil
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2007, 69 (01) : 103 - 107
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2015, PI RADS PROSTATE IMA
  • [3] PI-RADS version 2.1: one small step for prostate MRI
    Barrett, T.
    Rajesh, A.
    Rosenkrantz, A. B.
    Choyke, P. L.
    Turkbey, B.
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (11) : 841 - 852
  • [4] Direct Comparison of PI-RADS Version 2 and 2.1 in Transition Zone Lesions for Detection of Prostate Cancer: Preliminary Experience
    Byun, Jieun
    Park, Kye Jin
    Kim, Mi-hyun
    Kim, Jeong Kon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2020, 52 (02) : 577 - 586
  • [5] Construction and validation of a nomogram to predict overall survival in patients with inflammatory breast cancer
    Diao, Jian-dong
    Ma, Li-xia
    Sun, Mei-yang
    Wu, Chun-jiao
    Wang, Li-juan
    Liu, Yan-ling
    Yang, Yong-jing
    [J]. CANCER MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (12): : 5600 - 5608
  • [6] The Value of PSA Density in Combination with PI-RADS™ for the Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Prediction
    Distler, Florian A.
    Radtke, Jan P.
    Bonekamp, David
    Kesch, Claudia
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Wieczorek, Kathrin
    Kirchner, Marietta
    Pahernik, Sascha
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Hadaschikk, Boris A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 198 (03) : 575 - 582
  • [7] The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Egevad, Lars
    Amin, Mahul B.
    Delahunt, Brett
    Srigley, John R.
    Humphrey, Peter A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 40 (02) : 244 - 252
  • [8] MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10 ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI
    Han, C.
    Liu, S.
    Qin, X. B.
    Ma, S.
    Zhu, L. N.
    Wang, X. Y.
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2020, 101 (04) : 235 - 244
  • [9] Comparison of multiparametric and biparametric MRI of the prostate: are gadolinium-based contrast agents needed for routine examinations?
    Junker, Daniel
    Steinkohl, Fabian
    Fritz, Veronika
    Bektic, Jasmin
    Tokas, Theodoros
    Aigner, Friedrich
    Herrmann, Thomas R. W.
    Rieger, Michael
    Nagele, Udo
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 37 (04) : 691 - 699
  • [10] Kosaka T, 2014, AM J CLIN EXP UROL, V2, P332