A nomogram based on PI-RADS v2.1 and clinical indicators for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer in the transition zone

被引:15
作者
Wei, Chaogang [1 ,2 ]
Pan, Peng [1 ]
Chen, Tong [1 ,3 ]
Zhang, Yueyue [1 ]
Dai, Guangcheng [4 ]
Tu, Jian [5 ]
Jiang, Zhen [1 ]
Zhao, Wenlu [1 ]
Shen, Junkang [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Radiol, Suzhou 215004, Peoples R China
[2] Soochow Univ, State Key Lab Radiat Med & Protect, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Soochow Univ, Inst Radiat Oncol Therapeut, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Urol Surg, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Soochow Univ, Dept Pathol, Affiliated Hosp 2, Suzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS); prostate cancer; nomogram; transition zone (TZ); ANTIGEN DENSITY; PSA DENSITY; DIAGNOSIS; ACCURACY; BIOPSY; NG/ML; MEN; MRI;
D O I
10.21037/tau-21-49
中图分类号
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This study attempted to develop a nomogram for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer (cs-PCa) in the transition zone (TZ) with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS v2.1) score based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bp-MRI) and clinical indicators. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 383 patients with suspicious prostate lesions in the TZ as a training cohort and 128 patients as the validation cohort from January 2015 to March 2020. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine independent predictors for building a nomogram, and the performance of the nomogram was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), the calibration curve and decision curve. Results: The PI-RADS v2.1 score and prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) were independent predictors of TZ cs-PCa. The prediction model had a significantly higher AUC (0.936) than the individual predictors (0.914 for PI-RADS v2.1 score, P=0.045, 0.842 for PSAD, P<0.001). The nomogram showed good discrimination (AUC of 0.936 in the training cohort and 0.963 in the validation cohort) and favorable calibration. When the PI-RADS v2.1 score was combined with PSAD, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 80.7% and 93.8%, respectively, which were better than those of the PI-RADS v2.1 score (sensitivity, 74.2%; specificity, 92.5%) and PSAD (sensitivity, 66.1%; specificity, 88.2%). Conclusions: The newly constructed nomogram exhibits satisfactory predictive accuracy and consistency for TZ cs-PCa. PI-RADS v2.1 based on bp-MRI is a strong predictor in the detection of TZ cs-PCa. Adding PSAD to PI-RADS v2.1 could improve its diagnostic performance, thereby avoiding unnecessary biopsies.
引用
收藏
页码:2435 / 2446
页数:12
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Prostate volume is strongest predictor of cancer diagnosis at transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy with prostate-specific antigen values between 2.0 and 9.0 ng/ml [J].
Al-Azab, Rami ;
Toi, Ants ;
Lockwood, Gina ;
Kulkarni, Girish S. ;
Fleshner, Neil .
UROLOGY, 2007, 69 (01) :103-107
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, PI RADS PROSTATE IMA
[3]   PI-RADS version 2.1: one small step for prostate MRI [J].
Barrett, T. ;
Rajesh, A. ;
Rosenkrantz, A. B. ;
Choyke, P. L. ;
Turkbey, B. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (11) :841-852
[4]   Direct Comparison of PI-RADS Version 2 and 2.1 in Transition Zone Lesions for Detection of Prostate Cancer: Preliminary Experience [J].
Byun, Jieun ;
Park, Kye Jin ;
Kim, Mi-hyun ;
Kim, Jeong Kon .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2020, 52 (02) :577-586
[5]   Construction and validation of a nomogram to predict overall survival in patients with inflammatory breast cancer [J].
Diao, Jian-dong ;
Ma, Li-xia ;
Sun, Mei-yang ;
Wu, Chun-jiao ;
Wang, Li-juan ;
Liu, Yan-ling ;
Yang, Yong-jing .
CANCER MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (12) :5600-5608
[6]   The Value of PSA Density in Combination with PI-RADS™ for the Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Prediction [J].
Distler, Florian A. ;
Radtke, Jan P. ;
Bonekamp, David ;
Kesch, Claudia ;
Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter ;
Wieczorek, Kathrin ;
Kirchner, Marietta ;
Pahernik, Sascha ;
Hohenfellner, Markus ;
Hadaschikk, Boris A. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 198 (03) :575-582
[7]   The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System [J].
Epstein, Jonathan I. ;
Egevad, Lars ;
Amin, Mahul B. ;
Delahunt, Brett ;
Srigley, John R. ;
Humphrey, Peter A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 40 (02) :244-252
[8]   MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10 ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI [J].
Han, C. ;
Liu, S. ;
Qin, X. B. ;
Ma, S. ;
Zhu, L. N. ;
Wang, X. Y. .
DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2020, 101 (04) :235-244
[9]   Comparison of multiparametric and biparametric MRI of the prostate: are gadolinium-based contrast agents needed for routine examinations? [J].
Junker, Daniel ;
Steinkohl, Fabian ;
Fritz, Veronika ;
Bektic, Jasmin ;
Tokas, Theodoros ;
Aigner, Friedrich ;
Herrmann, Thomas R. W. ;
Rieger, Michael ;
Nagele, Udo .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 37 (04) :691-699
[10]  
Kosaka T, 2014, AM J CLIN EXP UROL, V2, P332