Deep Learning for Prediction of Water Quality Index Classification: Tropical Catchment Environmental Assessment

被引:59
作者
Tiyasha [1 ]
Tung, Tran Minh [1 ]
Yaseen, Zaher Mundher [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ton Duc Thang Univ, Fac Civil Engn, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[2] Al Ayen Univ, Sci Res Ctr, New Era & Dev Civil Engn Res Grp, Nasiriyah 64001, Thi Qar, Iraq
[3] Asia Univ, Coll Creat Design, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词
Deep learning; River water quality index; Catchment sustainability; Classification; Water quality modeling; River management; MODELS; RIVER;
D O I
10.1007/s11053-021-09922-5
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
River water quality modeling using crucial artificial intelligent (AI) models has become an essential tool for river assessment and management. The simplified approach of river health assessment involves computation of water quality index (WQI). In this study, WQI calculation is based on six water quality variables (i.e., dissolved oxygen in % saturation (DO% sat), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD-Cr), pH, suspended solids (SS), and ammoniacal nitrogen (NH3-N)). This study introduces H2O deep learning (DL), random forest (RF), and decision tree (DT) classification models for WQI based on two investigated modeling scenarios-S-I and S-II. S-I uses a Klang River dataset from five monitoring sites representing a "small-scale catchment"; S-II uses a Klang River Basin dataset from 19 stations representing a "large-scale catchment". In both scenarios, H2O DL model demonstrated excellent outcome and RF performed rather better in S-I, in terms of model performance accuracy as well as classification error. In S-I/S-II, the accuracy for H2O DL was 88.6%/87.8%, RF 89%/84%, and DT 83%/77%; moreover, in terms of classification error for S-I/S-II, H2O DL 11.3%/12%, RF 10.8%/16%, and DT 14%/22%. H2O DL showed excellent performance when dealing with nonlinear, non-stationary, and varying number of WQ data, and it was followed by the RF model. This study highlights the application of the novel H2O DL and RF models for prediction of river WQI classes. The classification based on WQI for small catchment is simple, fast, cost-effective, and beneficial for river WQ assessment, management, and policy-making. Nonetheless, for a large catchment hydrological dataset, it is yet to be improved using specific function of AI algorithm.
引用
收藏
页码:4235 / 4254
页数:20
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Evolutionary computational intelligence algorithm coupled with self-tuning predictive model for water quality index determination [J].
Abba, S., I ;
Hadi, Sinan Jasim ;
Sammen, Saad Sh ;
Salih, Sinan Q. ;
Abdulkadir, R. A. ;
Quoc Bao Pham ;
Yaseen, Zaher Mundher .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2020, 587
[2]  
Agresti Alan., 2006, An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis, VSecond
[3]   Complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition hybridized with random forest and kernel ridge regression model for monthly rainfall forecasts [J].
Ali, Mumtaz ;
Prasad, Ramendra ;
Xiang, Yong ;
Yaseen, Zaher Mundher .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2020, 584
[4]   On the implementation of a novel data-intelligence model based on extreme learning machine optimized by bat algorithm for estimating daily chlorophyll-a concentration: Case studies of river and lake in USA [J].
Alizamir, Meysam ;
Heddam, Salim ;
Kim, Sungwon ;
Mehr, Ali Danandeh .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 285
[5]   The CAMELS-CL dataset: catchment attributes and meteorology for large sample studies - Chile dataset [J].
Alvarez-Garreton, Camila ;
Mendoza, Pablo A. ;
Pablo Boisier, Juan ;
Addor, Nans ;
Galleguillos, Mauricio ;
Zambrano-Bigiarini, Mauricio ;
Lara, Antonio ;
Puelma, Cristobal ;
Cortes, Gonzalo ;
Garreaud, Rene ;
McPhee, James ;
Ayala, Alvaro .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2018, 22 (11) :5817-5846
[6]   Load-carrying capacity and mode failure simulation of beam-column joint connection: Application of self-tuning machine learning model [J].
Alwanas, Afrah Abdulelah Hamzah ;
Al-Musawi, Abeer A. ;
Salih, Sinan Q. ;
Tao, Hai ;
Ali, Mumtaz ;
Yaseen, Zaher Mundher .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2019, 194 :220-229
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ICML
[8]   River water quality index prediction and uncertainty analysis: A comparative study of machine learning models [J].
Asadollah, Seyed Babak Haji Seyed ;
Sharafati, Ahmad ;
Motta, Davide ;
Yaseen, Zaher Mundher .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 9 (01)
[9]  
Augusto C., 2016, J. Urban Environ. Eng., V10, P1, DOI [10.4090/juee.2016.v10n1.003010, DOI 10.4090/JUEE.2016.V10N1.003010]
[10]  
Awadh S., 2021, Knowl.-Based Eng. Sci, V2, P1, DOI [10.51526/kbes.2021.2.1.1-8, DOI 10.51526/KBES.2021.2.1.1-8]