A Choquet integral -based hesitant fuzzy gained and lost dominance score method for multi -criteria group decision making considering the risk preferences of experts: Case study of higher business education evaluation

被引:47
作者
Liao, Zhiqiang [1 ]
Liao, Huchang [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Ming [1 ]
Al-Barakati, Abdullah [2 ]
Llopis-Albert, Carlos [3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Sch Business, Chengdu 610064, Peoples R China
[2] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Comp & Informat Technol, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
[3] Univ Politecn Valencia, Ctr Invest Ingn Mecan CIIM, Camino Vera S-N, Valencia 46022, Spain
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
LINGUISTIC TERM SETS; OF-THE-ART; PROSPECT-THEORY; INFORMATION FUSION; AGGREGATION; HIERARCHY; DISTANCE; ORDERS; TOPSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.inffus.2020.05.003
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
With the rapid development of higher business education, higher business education evaluation has attracted considerable attention of researchers and practitioners. The higher business education evaluation is an essential part of the development of a business school, which has a direct impact on its resource distribution. The higher business education evaluation can be considered as a multiple criteria group decision making (MCGDM) problem that involves a group of experts. Due to the complexity of the decision-making problem, decision criteria are not fully independent to each other, and the assumption of complete rationality of experts is usually invalid in many situations. In this paper, we propose a Choquet integral-based hesitant fuzzy gained and lost dominance score method to address the two important issues regarding the interactions among criteria and the behavior preference characteristics of experts in MCGDM problems. Firstly, a comprehensive distance measure of hesitant fuzzy sets is introduced by considering the relative importance of two separations. Then, a Choquet integral-based hesitant fuzzy gained and lost dominance score method based on the prospect theory is proposed to address the MCGDM problems in which experts make decision with the risk preference psychology. Finally, an illustrative example of higher business education evaluation is provided to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed method, and the sensitivity and comparative analysis are also completed to verify the validity of the proposed method. © 2020
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 133
页数:13
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Adam A.K., 2016, ASSESSING I SUCCESS
[2]   Modelling Human Decision Behaviour with Preference Learning [J].
Aggarwal, Manish ;
Tehrani, Ali Fallah .
INFORMS JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2019, 31 (02) :318-334
[3]   Robust Ordinal Regression and Stochastic Multiobjective Acceptability Analysis in multiple criteria hierarchy process for the Choquet integral preference model [J].
Angilella, Silvia ;
Corrente, Salvatore ;
Greco, Salvatore ;
Slowinski, Roman .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2016, 63 :154-169
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1964, Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheor. Verw. Geb., DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00531932
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1993, 9 FUZZ SYST S SAPP J, DOI DOI 10.5555/2035446
[6]   Aggregation functions for typical hesitant fuzzy elements and the action of automorphisms [J].
Bedregal, Benjamin ;
Reiser, Renata ;
Bustince, Humberto ;
Lopez-Molina, Carlos ;
Torra, Vicenc .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2014, 255 :82-99
[7]   On the Choquet multiple criteria preference aggregation model: Theoretical and practical insights from a real-world application [J].
Bottero, M. ;
Ferretti, V ;
Figueira, J. R. ;
Greco, S. ;
Roy, B. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 271 (01) :120-140
[8]   Generation of linear orders for intervals by means of aggregation functions [J].
Bustince, H. ;
Fernandez, J. ;
Kolesarova, A. ;
Mesiar, R. .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2013, 220 :69-77
[9]   A Historical Account of Types of Fuzzy Sets and Their Relationships [J].
Bustince, Humberto ;
Barrenechea, Edurne ;
Pagola, Miguel ;
Fernandez, Javier ;
Xu, Zeshui ;
Bedregal, Benjamin ;
Montero, Javier ;
Hagras, Hani ;
Herrera, Francisco ;
De Baets, Bernard .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2016, 24 (01) :179-194
[10]   Proportional hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set for multiple criteria group decision making [J].
Chen, Zhen-Song ;
Chin, Kwai-Sang ;
Li, Yan-Lai ;
Yang, Yi .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2016, 357 :61-87