Perceptions of Pediatric Physical Therapists and Physical Educators on Classifying Learning Styles of Children and Adolescents With Cerebral Palsy

被引:1
作者
Smits, Dirk-Wouter [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Verschuren, Olaf [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gorter, Jan Willem [4 ]
Lindeman, Eline [1 ,2 ]
Jongmans, Marian [3 ,5 ,6 ]
Ketelaar, Marjolijn [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Rehabil Ctr De Hoogstraat Utrecht, Ctr Excellence Rehabil Med Utrecht, NL-3583 TM Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Rehabil Nursing Sci & Sports, Rudolf Magnus Inst Neurosci, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] NetChild Network Childhood Disabil Res Netherland, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] McMaster Univ, CanChild Ctr Childhood Disabil Res, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Utrecht, Dept Special Educ, Utrecht, Netherlands
[6] Wilhelmina Childrens Hosp, Dept Paediat Psychol, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Cerebral palsy; learning styles; motor activities; motor learning; physical educators; physical therapists; teaching; OCCUPATIONAL-THERAPY; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.3109/01942638.2011.578006
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to examine professionals' perceptions on classifying learning styles in the context of teaching motor activities to children and adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP). The participants were 21 pediatric physical therapists (PPTs) and seven physical educators (PEs) in three schools for special education in The Netherlands. All participants were introduced to the key descriptions of two existing learning style instruments (Kolb's Learning Style Inventory and Myers-Briggs Type Indicator), applied them to children and adolescents with CP, and reported their perceptions in written surveys. This study had a mixed-methods design. Quantitative and qualitative data analyses showed that PPTs and PEs are mostly positive about the idea of classifying learning styles in the context of teaching motor activities to children and adolescents with CP, giving three main reasons: individual approach, professional communication, and treatment awareness. Additionally, qualitative data analysis showed that the key descriptions of the two learning style instruments were not feasible as classifications for children and adolescents with CP. It is therefore recommended that other learning style classification instruments should be explored and that possibly a new learning style classification instrument should be developed in the context of teaching motor activities to children and adolescents with CP.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 412
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, PLEASE UNDERSTAND ME
[2]  
Cassidy S., 2004, EDUC PSYCHOL-UK, V24, P419, DOI DOI 10.1080/0144341042000228834
[3]  
Coffield F., 2004, Learning Styles and Pedagogy in Post-16 Learning
[4]  
Coker C.A., 2009, Motor learning control for practitioners
[5]  
Denby Florence, 2003, Top Stroke Rehabil, V9, P34
[6]  
Desmedt E., 2004, ED PSYCHOL, V24, P454
[7]  
DREEBEN O, 2009, PATIENT ED REHABILIT
[8]  
Fujii DE, 1996, PROF PSYCHOL-RES PR, V27, P266
[9]   The four-quadrant model of facilitated learning (Part 1): Using teaching-learning approaches in occupational therapy [J].
Greber, Craig ;
Ziviani, Jenny ;
Rodger, Sylvia .
AUSTRALIAN OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY JOURNAL, 2007, 54 :S31-S39
[10]  
Honey P., 2000, LEARNING STYLES HELP