Effect of Galcanezumab on Total Pain Burden in Patients Who Had Previously Not Benefited from Migraine Preventive Medication (CONQUER Trial): A Post Hoc Analysis

被引:1
作者
Ailani, Jessica [1 ]
Andrews, Jeffrey Scott [2 ]
Tockhorn-Heidenreich, Antje [2 ]
Wenzel, Richard [2 ]
Rettiganti, Mallikarjuna [2 ]
机构
[1] Medstar Georgetown Univ, Washington, DC USA
[2] Eli Lilly & Co, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
关键词
CONQUER trial; Galcanezumab; Migraine; Prior preventive failures; Total pain burden; HEADACHE;
D O I
10.1007/s12325-022-02233-y
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Introduction In evaluating therapies for migraine prevention, emphasis is placed on frequency and less attention is paid to duration or severity. Total pain burden (TPB) combines frequency, duration, and severity of migraine headache, and has the potential to further characterize the benefit of preventive treatment using a single composite measure. TPB was previously used to characterize response to galcanezumab (GMB) in patients with migraine. In this post hoc analysis we assessed the impact of GMB in lowering TPB in patients who had previously not benefited from two to four categories of migraine preventive medication. Methods CONQUER trial patients (N = 462), 18-75 years old who had previously not benefited from two to four categories of migraine preventive medication, were randomized (1:1) to monthly placebo or GMB 120 mg with 240 mg loading dose. For each patient, monthly TPB in severity-weighted hours was calculated by multiplying migraine headache duration (hours) by maximum severity for each migraine headache day, then summing these daily scores over the month for the monthly score. Changes from baseline in monthly TPB across months 1-3 were analyzed. Spearman correlations between TPB and scores on the Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (MSQ) total and Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) were assessed at baseline. Results Mean (SD) baseline monthly TPB was 192.1 (158.3) and 188.2 (197.4) severity-weighted hours for GMB-treated and placebo-treated patients, respectively. Across the 3-month double-blind period, GMB-treated patients experienced significantly greater mean reductions from baseline in monthly TPB compared with placebo-treated patients, both for mean change (GMB - 82.7, placebo - 15.8, p < 0.001) and percentage change (GMB - 38.6%, placebo 9.4%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, baseline TPB correlated with MSQ score (r = - 0.39) and MIDAS score (r = 0.40), suggesting good association of TPB with functional and disability outcomes. Conclusion GMB reduced mean TPB in patients who had previously not benefited from two to four categories of migraine preventive medication.
引用
收藏
页码:4544 / 4555
页数:12
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] The American Headache Society Consensus Statement: Update on integrating new migraine treatments into clinical practice
    Ailani, Jessica
    Burch, Rebecca C.
    Robbins, Matthew S.
    [J]. HEADACHE, 2021, 61 (07): : 1021 - 1039
  • [2] Impact of galcanezumab on total pain burden: findings from phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in patients with episodic or chronic migraine (EVOLVE-1, EVOLVE-2, and REGAIN trials)
    Ailani, Jessica
    Andrews, J. Scott
    Rettiganti, Mallikarjuna
    Nicholson, Robert A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [3] The prevalence and impact of migraine and severe headache in the United States: Updated age, sex, and socioeconomic-specific estimates from government health surveys
    Burch, Rebecca
    Rizzoli, Paul
    Loder, Elizabeth
    [J]. HEADACHE, 2021, 61 (01): : 60 - 68
  • [4] Galcanezumab in chronic migraine The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN study
    Detke, Holland C.
    Goadsby, Peter J.
    Wang, Shufang
    Friedman, Deborah I.
    Selzler, Katherine J.
    Aurora, Sheena K.
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2018, 91 (24) : E2211 - E2221
  • [5] Guidelines for controlled trials of preventive treatment of migraine attacks in episodic migraine in adults
    Diener, Hans-Christoph
    Tassorelli, Cristina
    Dodick, David W.
    Silberstein, Stephan D.
    Lipton, Richard B.
    Ashina, Messoud
    Becker, Werner J.
    Ferrari, Michel D.
    Goadsby, Peter J.
    Pozo-Rosich, Patricia
    Wang, Shuu-Jiun
    Houle, Timothy T.
    van den Hoek, Thomas C.
    Martinelli, Daniele
    Terwindt, Gisela M.
    [J]. CEPHALALGIA, 2020, 40 (10) : 1026 - 1044
  • [6] EMGALITY, 2019, EMGALITY PACKAGE INS
  • [7] Development and validation of the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire
    Jhingran, P
    Osterhaus, JT
    Miller, DW
    Lee, JT
    Kirchdoerfer, L
    [J]. HEADACHE, 1998, 38 (04): : 295 - 302
  • [8] Chronic headache - New advances in treatment strategies
    Lake, AE
    Saper, JR
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2002, 59 (05) : S8 - S13
  • [9] Methodological issues in systematic reviews of headache trials: Adapting historical diagnostic classifications and outcome measures to present-day standards
    McCrory, DC
    Gray, RN
    Tfelt-Hansen, P
    Steiner, TJ
    Taylor, FR
    [J]. HEADACHE, 2005, 45 (05): : 459 - 465
  • [10] Safety and efficacy of galcanezumab in patients for whom previous migraine preventive medication from two to four categories had failed (CONQUER): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial
    Mulleners, Wim M.
    Kim, Byung-Kun
    Lainez, Miguel J. A.
    Lanteri-Minet, Michel
    Pozo-Rosich, Patricia
    Wang, Shufang
    Tockhorn-Heidenreich, Antje
    Aurora, Sheena K.
    Nichols, Russell M.
    Yunes-Medina, Laura
    Detke, Holland C.
    [J]. LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2020, 19 (10) : 814 - 825