Performance evaluation of municipal services with fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approaches: a case study from Turkey

被引:7
作者
Ozdogan, Seyma [1 ]
Yildizbasi, Abdullah [2 ]
Rouyendegh, Babak Daneshvar [2 ]
机构
[1] Konya Food & Agr Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-42080 Konya, Turkey
[2] Ankara Yildirim Beyazit Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-06010 Ankara, Turkey
来源
SN APPLIED SCIENCES | 2020年 / 2卷 / 06期
关键词
Municipal service selection; Multi-criteria decision making; Fuzzy TOPSIS; Fuzzy AHP; TOPSIS; AHP;
D O I
10.1007/s42452-020-2843-8
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Performance evaluation is a multi-criteria decision making subject to assign effective municipal services. Municipalities are the organizations that see the common needs and services of a city or county, and the person in charge of the municipal administration is called the "mayor." The biggest duty of the mayor is to create an atmosphere of peace for the residents of the town where it is located, to respond to the needs of the town and the public and to conduct appropriate meetings. Mayors must meet all the requirements to make his/her town better and more functional. However, it is also not possible and takes a long time to meet all the needs of the people at the perfect level because of limited sources that municipalities have. Therefore, mayors should prioritize the tasks that can satisfy the public the most among the services they offer to the public. In this study, the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution methods, which are widely used in the literature, were used for the prioritization of the municipal services. This study is expected to shed light on mayors with limited resources to increase public satisfaction in the short term.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, INT ACAD J BUSINESS
[2]  
Ansari M, 2016, INT J HUM-COMPUT ST, V3, P185
[3]  
Bostanci B., 2016, ELECT J MAP TECHNOLO, V8, P110
[4]   A decision-making approach based on fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS methodology for selecting the appropriate cloud solution to manage big data projects [J].
Boutkhoum O. ;
Hanine M. ;
Agouti T. ;
Tikniouine A. .
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 2017, 8 (Suppl 2) :1237-1253
[5]  
Bozdogan T, 2016, WORLD ACCOUNT SCI, V18, P2
[6]   An integrated AHP-TOPSIS framework for foreign direct investment in Turkey [J].
Calik, Ahmet ;
Cizmecioglu, Sinan ;
Akpinar, Ayhan .
JOURNAL OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, 2019, 26 (5-6) :296-307
[7]  
Dikmen S., 2015, ULUSLARARASI YONETIM, V11, P59
[8]   Evaluation of hazardous waste transportation firms by using a two step fuzzy-AHP and TOPSIS methodology [J].
Gumus, Alev Taskin .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (02) :4067-4074
[9]   Comparison of Indoor Air Quality for Air-Conditioned and Naturally Ventilated Office Spaces in Urban Area [J].
Jain, Supreme ;
Garg, Divyam ;
Goel, Anubha .
INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, ACIEQ, 2020, 60 :1-8
[10]  
Kamble P.N., 2018, J COMPUTER MATH SCI, V9, P1161, DOI 10.29055/jcms/855