Process Innovation Via Supercritical Water Gasification to Improve the Conventional Plants Performance in Treating Highly Humid Biomass

被引:11
作者
Molino, A. [1 ]
Giordano, G. [3 ]
Migliori, M. [3 ]
Lauro, V. [3 ]
Santarcangelo, G. [3 ]
Marino, T. [4 ]
Larocca, V. [1 ]
Tarquini, P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Agcy New Technol Energy & Sustainable Econ D, ENEA, CR Enea Trisaia, SS 106 Ionica,Km 419 500, I-75026 Matera, Italy
[2] CR Enea Casaccia, Via Anguillarese 301, I-00123 Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Calabria, Dept Environm & Chem Engn, Via P Bucci Cubo 44a, I-87036 Arcavacata Di Rende, CS, Italy
[4] ITM CNR, Inst Membrane Technol, Via P Bucci Cubo 17-C, I-87036 Arcavacata Di Rende, CS, Italy
关键词
Biomass; Power energy; Biofuels; Supercritical fluids; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; BIOMETHANE PRODUCTION; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; GRID INJECTION; NATURAL-GAS; METHANATION; MEMBRANE; REACTOR; PURIFICATION; TECHNOLOGIES;
D O I
10.1007/s12649-016-9528-y
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The aim of the paper is a comparison among three innovative process layouts for biomethane and power production from humid biomasses: anaerobic digestion (AD), supercritical water gasification integrated in a supercritical steam turbine stages (SCWG + SuST) and a technology that combines these two, AD plus SCWG and SuST. All the solutions were implemented in an ad hoc simulative tool of Aspen Hysis(A (R)) v.7.0.1. Livestock sludge (LS) with an energy content up to 10 wt% (ashes free) was used as reference biomass to establish and compare the performance of any proposed process scheme. LS feedstocks introduced in the SCWG + SuST increased both biomethane production and power production of about 50 % compared to AD process that produces 25 Nm(3)/(day t) of pure biomethane. Combining both technologies, the digestate from AD outflow is feeding the SCWG + SuST process, there is an increase of 50 % of power generation with a production of biomethane of about 36 Nm(3)/(day t). Another advantage of the SCWG + SuST is that, set the fed, it is possible to reduce drastically the volume of the plant because the fermentation step, which usually corresponds to 15-30 days, is not required. Considering that although AD process is a simple and consolidated technology, it does not allow the total recovery of the organic compounds and requires long period for the biomass, the proposed innovative processes could offer new solutions for biomethane and power production.
引用
收藏
页码:1289 / 1295
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Catalytic methanation reaction over supported nickel-ruthenium oxide base for purification of simulated natural gas [J].
Abu Bakar, W. A. W. ;
Ali, R. ;
Toemen, S. .
SCIENTIA IRANICA, 2012, 19 (03) :525-534
[2]   CO2 as carbon source for fuel synthesis [J].
Barbarossa, Vincenzo ;
Vanga, Giuseppina ;
Viscardi, Rosanna ;
Gattia, Daniele Mirabile .
ATI 2013 - 68TH CONFERENCE OF THE ITALIAN THERMAL MACHINES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION, 2014, 45 :1325-1329
[3]  
Basu P., 2013, Biomass Gasification, Pyrolysis and Torrefaction, VSecond, P315
[4]  
Bröll D, 1999, ANGEW CHEM INT EDIT, V38, P2999
[5]   Catalytic and Non-catalytic Supercritical Water Gasification of Microalgae and Glycerol [J].
Chakinala, Anand G. ;
Brilman, Derk W. F. ;
van Swaaij, Wim P. M. ;
Kersten, Sascha R. A. .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2010, 49 (03) :1113-1122
[6]   Hydrogen Production from Biomass via Supercritical Water Gasification [J].
Demirbas, A. .
ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2010, 32 (14) :1342-1354
[7]   Modelling and Simulation of Methanation Catalytic Reactor for Renewable Electricity Storage [J].
Er-rbib, Hanaa ;
Bouallou, Chakib .
16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROCESS INTEGRATION, MODELLING AND OPTIMISATION FOR ENERGY SAVING AND POLLUTION REDUCTION (PRES'13), 2013, 35 :541-546
[8]   The future challenges for "clean coal technologies": joining efficiency increase and pollutant emission control [J].
Franco, Alessandro ;
Diaz, Ana R. .
ENERGY, 2009, 34 (03) :348-354
[9]   LIQUEFACTION OF LIGNIN SULFONATE WITH SUBCRITICAL AND SUPERCRITICAL WATER [J].
FUNAZUKURI, T ;
WAKAO, N ;
SMITH, JM .
FUEL, 1990, 69 (03) :349-353
[10]  
Gunaseelan VN, 1997, BIOMASS BIOENERG, V13, P83, DOI 10.1016/S0961-9534(97)00020-2