Evaluation of hidden hearing loss in normal-hearing firearm users

被引:6
|
作者
Grinn, Sarah K. [1 ]
Le Prell, Colleen G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Cent Michigan Univ, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Mt Pleasant, MI 48859 USA
[2] Univ Texas Dallas, Dept Speech Language & Hearing, Dallas, TX USA
关键词
synaptopathy; hidden hearing loss; noise induced hearing loss (NIHL); firearm noise; temporary threshold shift (TTS); speech-in-noise; Words in Noise (WIN); ABR Wave-I; BRAIN-STEM RESPONSE; EAR MUSCLE-REFLEX; NOISE EXPOSURE; COCHLEAR SYNAPTOPATHY; AUDITORY FUNCTION; YOUNG-ADULTS; WORD-RECOGNITION; NO EVIDENCE; TINNITUS; DEGENERATION;
D O I
10.3389/fnins.2022.1005148
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Some noise exposures resulting in temporary threshold shift (TTS) result in cochlear synaptopathy. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate a human population that might be at risk for noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy (i.e., "hidden hearing loss"). Participants were firearm users who were (1) at-risk for prior audiometric noise-induced threshold shifts, given their history of firearm use, (2) likely to have experienced complete threshold recovery if any prior TTS had occurred, based on this study's normal-hearing inclusion criteria, and (3) not at-risk for significant age-related synaptopathic loss, based on this study's young-adult inclusion criteria. 70 participants (age 18-25 yr) were enrolled, including 33 firearm users experimental (EXP), and 37 non-firearm users control (CNTRL). All participants were required to exhibit audiometric thresholds <= 20 dB HL bilaterally, from 0.25 to 8 kHz. The study was designed to test the hypothesis that EXP participants would exhibit a reduced cochlear nerve response compared to CNTRL participants, despite normal-hearing sensitivity in both groups. No statistically significant group differences in auditory performance were detected between the CNTRL and EXP participants on standard audiom to etry, extended high-frequency audiometry, Words-in-Noise performance, distortion product otoacoustic emission, middle ear muscle reflex, or auditory brainstem response. Importantly, 91% of EXP participants reported that they wore hearing protection either "all the time" or "almost all the time" while using firearms. The data suggest that consistent use of hearing protection during firearm use can effectively protect cochlear and neural measures of auditory function, including suprathreshold responses. The current results do not exclude the possibility that neural pathology may be evident in firearm users with less consistent hearing protection use. However, firearm users with less consistent hearing protection use are also more likely to exhibit threshold elevation, among other cochlear deficits, thereby confounding the isolation of any potentially selective neural deficits. Taken together, it seems most likely that firearm users who consistently and correctly use hearing protection will exhibit preserved measures of cochlear and neural function, while firearm users who inconsistently and incorrectly use hearing protection are most likely to exhibit cochlear injury, rather than evidence of selective neural injury in the absence of cochlear injury.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Hearing in Noise Test, HINT-Brazil, in normal-hearing children
    Novelli, Carolina Lino
    de Carvalho, Nadia Giulian
    Colella-Santos, Maria Francisca
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 84 (03) : 360 - 367
  • [42] GAP DETECTION AND MASKING IN HEARING-IMPAIRED AND NORMAL-HEARING SUBJECTS
    GLASBERG, BR
    MOORE, BCJ
    BACON, SP
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1987, 81 (05): : 1546 - 1556
  • [43] INVESTIGATION OF MUSICAL ABILITIES IN HEARING-IMPAIRED AND NORMAL-HEARING CHILDREN
    KLAJMAN, S
    KOLDEJ, E
    KOWALSKA, A
    FOLIA PHONIATRICA, 1982, 34 (05): : 229 - 233
  • [44] Sample discrimination of frequency by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners
    Alexander, Joshua M.
    Lutfi, Robert A.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2008, 123 (01): : 241 - 253
  • [45] Acoustic Analysis of Persian Vowels in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison With Hearing-impaired Children Using Hearing Aid and Normal-hearing Children
    Jafari, Narges
    Yadegari, Fariba
    Jalaie, Shohreh
    JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2016, 30 (06) : 763.e1 - 763.e7
  • [46] Sample discrimination of frequency by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners
    Alexander, Joshua M.
    Lutfi, Robert A.
    Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2008, 123 (01): : 241 - 253
  • [47] VISEMES OBSERVED BY HEARING-IMPAIRED AND NORMAL-HEARING ADULT VIEWERS
    OWENS, E
    BLAZEK, B
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1985, 28 (03): : 381 - 393
  • [48] LINGUISTIC PERFORMANCE OF HARD-OF-HEARING AND NORMAL-HEARING CHILDREN - REPLY
    STEPHENS, MI
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1975, 18 (04): : 820 - 821
  • [49] Intraspeech spread of masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners
    Summers, V
    Leek, MR
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1997, 101 (05): : 2866 - 2876
  • [50] NONVERBAL SENSITIVITY OF NORMAL-HEARING AND HEARING-IMPAIRED OLDER ADULTS
    RIGO, TG
    LIEBERMAN, DA
    EAR AND HEARING, 1989, 10 (03): : 184 - 189