Evaluation of hidden hearing loss in normal-hearing firearm users

被引:6
|
作者
Grinn, Sarah K. [1 ]
Le Prell, Colleen G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Cent Michigan Univ, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Mt Pleasant, MI 48859 USA
[2] Univ Texas Dallas, Dept Speech Language & Hearing, Dallas, TX USA
关键词
synaptopathy; hidden hearing loss; noise induced hearing loss (NIHL); firearm noise; temporary threshold shift (TTS); speech-in-noise; Words in Noise (WIN); ABR Wave-I; BRAIN-STEM RESPONSE; EAR MUSCLE-REFLEX; NOISE EXPOSURE; COCHLEAR SYNAPTOPATHY; AUDITORY FUNCTION; YOUNG-ADULTS; WORD-RECOGNITION; NO EVIDENCE; TINNITUS; DEGENERATION;
D O I
10.3389/fnins.2022.1005148
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Some noise exposures resulting in temporary threshold shift (TTS) result in cochlear synaptopathy. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate a human population that might be at risk for noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy (i.e., "hidden hearing loss"). Participants were firearm users who were (1) at-risk for prior audiometric noise-induced threshold shifts, given their history of firearm use, (2) likely to have experienced complete threshold recovery if any prior TTS had occurred, based on this study's normal-hearing inclusion criteria, and (3) not at-risk for significant age-related synaptopathic loss, based on this study's young-adult inclusion criteria. 70 participants (age 18-25 yr) were enrolled, including 33 firearm users experimental (EXP), and 37 non-firearm users control (CNTRL). All participants were required to exhibit audiometric thresholds <= 20 dB HL bilaterally, from 0.25 to 8 kHz. The study was designed to test the hypothesis that EXP participants would exhibit a reduced cochlear nerve response compared to CNTRL participants, despite normal-hearing sensitivity in both groups. No statistically significant group differences in auditory performance were detected between the CNTRL and EXP participants on standard audiom to etry, extended high-frequency audiometry, Words-in-Noise performance, distortion product otoacoustic emission, middle ear muscle reflex, or auditory brainstem response. Importantly, 91% of EXP participants reported that they wore hearing protection either "all the time" or "almost all the time" while using firearms. The data suggest that consistent use of hearing protection during firearm use can effectively protect cochlear and neural measures of auditory function, including suprathreshold responses. The current results do not exclude the possibility that neural pathology may be evident in firearm users with less consistent hearing protection use. However, firearm users with less consistent hearing protection use are also more likely to exhibit threshold elevation, among other cochlear deficits, thereby confounding the isolation of any potentially selective neural deficits. Taken together, it seems most likely that firearm users who consistently and correctly use hearing protection will exhibit preserved measures of cochlear and neural function, while firearm users who inconsistently and incorrectly use hearing protection are most likely to exhibit cochlear injury, rather than evidence of selective neural injury in the absence of cochlear injury.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Recognition of accented English in quiet by younger normal-hearing listeners and older listeners with normal-hearing and hearing loss
    Gordon-Salant, Sandra
    Yeni-Komshian, Grace H.
    Fitzgibbons, Peter J.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2010, 128 (01): : 444 - 455
  • [2] DYNAMIC BALANCE PERFORMANCE OF STUDENTS WITH NORMAL-HEARING AND WITH SENSORINEURAL HEARING LOSS
    Melo, Renato de Souza
    Lemos, Andrea
    Falcao Raposo, Maria Cristina
    Ferraz, Karla Monica
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE MEDICINA DO ESPORTE, 2014, 20 (06) : 442 - 446
  • [3] New options for rehabilitation of conductive hearing loss Tests on normal-hearing subjects with simulated hearing loss
    Brill, I. T.
    Brill, S.
    Stark, T.
    HNO, 2019, 67 (09) : 698 - 705
  • [4] Auditory, Visual, and Cognitive Abilities in Normal-Hearing Adults, Hearing Aid Users, and Cochlear Implant Users
    Ceuleers, Dorien
    Keppler, Hannah
    Degeest, Sofie
    Baudonck, Nele
    Swinnen, Freya
    Kestens, Katrien
    Dhooge, Ingeborg
    EAR AND HEARING, 2024, 45 (03): : 679 - 694
  • [5] Evaluation of cochlear activity in normal-hearing musicians
    Washnik, Nilesh J.
    Bhatt, Ishan Sunilkumar
    Phillips, Susan L.
    Tucker, Denise
    Richter, Scott
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2020, 395
  • [6] EVALUATION OF A SPEECH ENHANCEMENT STRATEGY WITH NORMAL-HEARING AND HEARING-IMPAIRED LISTENERS
    JAMIESON, DG
    BRENNAN, RL
    CORNELISSE, LE
    EAR AND HEARING, 1995, 16 (03): : 274 - 286
  • [7] Assessment of Hidden Hearing Loss in Normal Hearing Individuals with and Without Tinnitus
    Kara, Eyyup
    Aydin, Kubra
    Akbulut, A. Alperen
    Karakol, Sare Nur
    Durmaz, Serkan
    Yener, H. Murat
    Gozen, E. Deniz
    Kara, Halide
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ADVANCED OTOLOGY, 2020, 16 (01): : 87 - 92
  • [8] OVERSHOOT IN NORMAL-HEARING AND HEARING-IMPAIRED SUBJECTS
    BACON, SP
    TAKAHASHI, GA
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1992, 91 (05): : 2865 - 2871
  • [9] BILATERAL IDIOPATHIC LOSS OF PERIPHERAL VESTIBULAR FUNCTION WITH NORMAL-HEARING
    VIBERT, D
    LIARD, P
    HAUSLER, R
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 1995, 115 (05) : 611 - 615
  • [10] DETECTION OF NORMAL-HEARING CARRIERS OF THE GENE FOR THE AUTOSOMAL DOMINANT PROGRESSIVE SENSORINEURAL HEARING-LOSS
    STOLBOVA, D
    VALVODA, M
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 1985, 99 (5-6) : 509 - 515