FRAX fracture risk in women with a recent fracture of the distal forearm: agreement between assessments with and without bone mineral density and impact of measurement side in the individual patient

被引:7
作者
Egsmose, Emilie Lund [1 ,2 ]
Birkvig, Mette [1 ,2 ]
Buhl, Thora [3 ]
Madsen, Ole Rintek [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Gentofte Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Gentofte Hosp, Osteoporosis Clin C, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Gentofte Hosp, Dept Clin Physiol & Nucl Med, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark
关键词
Agreement; Bland-Altman method; BMD; Forearm fracture; FRAX; TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY; OSTEOPOROSIS; MEN; MANAGEMENT; GUIDELINES; DIAGNOSIS; UPDATE; HIP;
D O I
10.1007/s10067-014-2640-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) has been developed by the World Health Organization to evaluate the 10-year risk of a hip fracture and a major osteoporotic fracture. We examined the agreement between fracture risk calculated with and without femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) in individual patients and the impact of BMD measurement side. Bilateral femoral neck BMD results obtained by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and clinical risk factor data from 140 women (age 66 +/- 8 years) with a recent distal forearm fracture were used for FRAX analyses. Discrepancies between pairs of risk assessments were analysed by the Bland-Altman method. Agreement on the individual level was expressed as 95 % limits of agreement (LoA) and on the group level as the mean (or median) of intra-individual differences (the bias). The femoral neck T-score was -1.69 +/- 0.87 (hip with lowest BMD value). The risk of a major fracture and a hip fracture based on the lowest femoral neck BMD value was 23.8 +/- 21.4 % and 7.6 +/- 8.3 %, respectively. For major fracture risk assessed without versus with the lowest BMD value, lower and upper LoA were -12.3 and 21.1 percentage points (pp) (bias 4.4 pp, p < 0.0001). The corresponding LoA for hip fracture risk were -11.6 and18.6 pp (bias 3.5 pp, p < 0.0001). LoA for major fracture risk assessed with the lowest versus the highest BMD value were 0.0 and 9.5 pp (bias 2.0, p < 0.0001), and correspondingly for hip fracture risk 0.0 and 9.5 pp (bias 1.0 pp, p < 0.0001). Intra-individual differences increased with increasing fracture risk. In conclusion, the 10-year fracture risk calculated without BMD was on the average slightly overestimated compared to calculations with BMD. On the individual patient level differences between fracture risk assessments with and without BMD were pronounced. The side of BMD measurement may also significantly influence the risk assessment result in individual patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1265 / 1272
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, WHO TECHN REP SER, V843
[2]   Evaluation of limited sampling strategies for total and free prednisolone in adult kidney transplant recipients [J].
Barraclough, Katherine A. ;
Isbel, Nicole M. ;
McWhinney, Brett C. ;
Ungerer, Jacobus P. J. ;
Medley, Gregory ;
Johnson, David W. ;
Hawley, Carmel M. ;
Leary, Diana R. ;
Campbell, Scott B. ;
Staatz, Christine E. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 67 (12) :1243-1252
[3]   Application of the National Osteoporosis Foundation Guidelines to postmenopausal women and men: the Framingham Osteoporosis Study [J].
Berry, S. D. ;
Kiel, D. P. ;
Donaldson, M. G. ;
Cummings, S. R. ;
Kanis, J. A. ;
Johansson, H. ;
Samelson, E. J. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 21 (01) :53-60
[4]   Measurement error and correlation coefficients [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 313 (7048) :41-42
[5]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[6]   Bone mineral density enhances use of clinical risk factors in predicting ten-year risk of osteoporotic fractures in Chinese men: the Hong Kong Osteoporosis Study [J].
Bow, C. H. ;
Tsang, S. W. Y. ;
Loong, C. H. N. ;
Soong, C. S. S. ;
Yeung, S. C. ;
Kung, A. W. C. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 22 (11) :2799-2807
[7]   2012 update of French guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis [J].
Briot, Karine ;
Cortet, Bernard ;
Thomas, Thierry ;
Audran, Maurice ;
Blain, Hubert ;
Breuil, Veronique ;
Chapuis, Laure ;
Chapurlat, Roland ;
Fardellone, Patrice ;
Feron, Jean-Marc ;
Gauvain, Jean-Bernard ;
Guggenbuhl, Pascal ;
Kolta, Sami ;
Lespessailles, Eric ;
Letombe, Brigitte ;
Marcelli, Christian ;
Orcel, Philippe ;
Seret, Patrick ;
Tremollieres, Florence ;
Rouxa, Christian .
JOINT BONE SPINE, 2012, 79 (03) :304-313
[8]   Diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and older men in the UK: National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) update 2013 [J].
Compston, J. ;
Bowring, C. ;
Cooper, A. ;
Cooper, C. ;
Davies, C. ;
Francis, R. ;
Kanis, J. A. ;
Marsh, D. ;
McCloskey, E. V. ;
Reid, D. M. ;
Selby, P. .
MATURITAS, 2013, 75 (04) :392-396
[9]   Implications of absolute fracture risk assessment for osteoporosis practice guidelines in the USA [J].
Dawson-Hughes, B. ;
Tosteson, A. N. A. ;
Melton, L. J., III ;
Baim, S. ;
Favus, M. J. ;
Khosla, S. ;
Lindsay, R. L. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 19 (04) :449-458
[10]   FRAX® counseling for bone health behavior change in women 50 years of age and older [J].
Dunniway, Diane L. ;
Camune, Barbara ;
Baldwin, Kathleen ;
Crane, James K. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2012, 24 (06) :382-389