Model-Agnostic Causal Principle for Unbiased KPI Anomaly Detection

被引:0
作者
Ji, Jiemin [1 ]
Guan, Donghai [1 ]
Deng, Yuwen [1 ]
Yuan, Weiwei [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Comp Sci & Technol, Nanjing, Peoples R China
来源
2022 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS (IJCNN) | 2022年
关键词
Anomaly Detection; Causal Inference; Time-series; Semi-supervised Learning;
D O I
10.1109/IJCNN55064.2022.9892664
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
KPI anomaly detection plays an important role in operation and maintenance. Due to incomplete or missing labels are common, methods based on VAE (i.e., Variational Auto-Encoder) is widely used. These methods assume that the normal patterns, which is in majority, will be learned, but this assumption is not easy to satisfy since abnormal patterns are inevitably embedded. Existing debias methods merely utilize anomalous labels to eliminate bias in the decoding process, but latent representation generated by the encoder could still be biased and even ill-defined when input KPIs are too abnormal. We propose a model-agnostic causal principle to make the above VAE-based models unbiased. When modifying ELBO (i.e., evidence of lower bound) to utilize anomalous labels, our causal principle indicates that the anomalous labels are confounders between training data and learned representations, leading to the aforementioned bias. Our principle also implements a do-operation to cut off the causal path from anomaly labels to training data. Through do-operation, we can eliminate the anomaly bias in the encoder and reconstruct normal patterns more frequently in the decoder. Our proposed causal improvement on existing VAE-based models, CausalDonut and CausalBagel, improve F1-score up to 5% compared to Donut and Bagel as well as surpassing state-of-the-art supervised and unsupervised models. To empirically prove the debias capability of our method, we also provide a comparison of anomaly scores between the baselines and our models. In addition, the learning process of our principle is interpreted from an entropy perspective.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   GANomaly: Semi-supervised Anomaly Detection via Adversarial Training [J].
Akcay, Samet ;
Atapour-Abarghouei, Amir ;
Breckon, Toby P. .
COMPUTER VISION - ACCV 2018, PT III, 2019, 11363 :622-637
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, 22 INT C ARTIFICIAL
[3]  
Boukerche A, 2020, ACM COMPUT SURV, V53, DOI [10.1145/3381028, 10.1145/3421763]
[4]  
Chen Jiawei, 2020, ARXIV201003240
[5]  
Cover T.M, 2006, Information theory and statistics: elements of information theory
[6]   RVAE-ABFA : Robust Anomaly Detection for High Dimensional Data Using Variational Autoencoder [J].
Gao, Yuda ;
Shi, Bin ;
Dong, Bo ;
Chen, Yan ;
Mi, Lingyun ;
Huang, Zhiping ;
Shi, Yuanyuan .
2020 IEEE 44TH ANNUAL COMPUTERS, SOFTWARE, AND APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE (COMPSAC 2020), 2020, :334-339
[7]   Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference [J].
Gillies, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2001, 52 (03) :613-622
[8]   Outlier Detection for Temporal Data: A Survey [J].
Gupta, Manish ;
Gao, Jing ;
Aggarwal, Charu C. ;
Han, Jiawei .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING, 2014, 26 (09) :2250-2267
[9]   An era of biological treatment in systemic lupus erythematosus [J].
He, Jing ;
Li, Zhanguo .
CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2018, 37 (01) :1-3
[10]   Detecting Spacecraft Anomalies Using LSTMs and Nonparametric Dynamic Thresholding [J].
Hundman, Kyle ;
Constantinou, Valentino ;
Laporte, Christopher ;
Colwell, Ian ;
Soderstrom, Tom .
KDD'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 24TH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY & DATA MINING, 2018, :387-395