Single dose oral etoricoxib for acute postoperative pain in adults

被引:30
作者
Clarke, Rachel [1 ]
Derry, Sheena [1 ]
Moore, R. Andrew [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Pain Res & Nuffield Dept Clin Neurosci, Nuffield Div Anaesthet, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
来源
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2012年 / 04期
关键词
Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Non-Steroidal; administration; dosage; adverse effects; Pain; Postoperative [drug therapy; Pyridines [administration & dosage; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfones [administration & dosage; Adult; Humans; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; DICHOTOMOUS OUTCOME MEASURES; INDIVIDUAL PATIENT METAANALYSIS; 3RD MOLAR EXTRACTION; CLINICAL-TRIALS; DOUBLE-BLIND; ANALGESIC EFFICACY; RELATIVE EFFICACY; PLACEBO; ACETAMINOPHEN;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD004309.pub3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Etoricoxib is a selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor licensed for the relief of chronic pain in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis, and acute pain in some jurisdictions. This class of drugs is believed to be associated with fewer upper gastrointestinal adverse effects than conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). One additional study in acute postoperative pain has been published since the original review was completed in Issue 2, 2009. Objectives To assess the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of a single oral dose of etoricoxib for moderate to severe postoperative pain. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Oxford Pain Database, ClinicalTrials.gov, and reference lists of articles. The date of the most recent search was 3 January 2012. Selection criteria Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials of single dose, oral etoricoxib for acute postoperative pain in adults. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently considered trials for inclusion in the review, assessed quality, and extracted data. We used the area under the pain relief versus time curve to derive the proportion of participants prescribed etoricoxib or placebo with at least 50% pain relief over six hours, using validated equations. We calculated relative risk (RR) and number needed to treat to benefit (NNT). We used information on use of rescue medication to calculate the proportion of participants requiring rescue medication and the weighted mean of the median time to use. We also collected information on adverse effects. Main results One additional study has been added to this updated review, making a total of six included studies with 1214 participants in comparisons of etoricoxib with placebo. All six studies reported on the 120 mg dose (798 participants in a comparison with placebo). At least 50% pain relief was reported by 66% with etoricoxib 120 mg and 12% with placebo (NNT 1.8 (1.7 to 2.0)). For dental studies only the NNT was 1.6 (1.5 to 1.8). Although the new study almost doubled the number of participants in included studies it added only about 25% more data for the 120 mg dose and the result was unchanged. Other doses (60, 90, 180, and 240 mg) were each studied in only one treatment arm and we did not undertake pooled analysis. Significantly fewer participants used rescue medication over 24 hours when taking etoricoxib 120 mg than placebo (NNT to prevent remedication 2.2 (1.9 to 2.8)), and the median time to use of rescue medication was 20 hours for etoricoxib and two hours for placebo. Adverse events were reported at a similar rate to placebo, with no serious events. Authors' conclusions The additional study did not change the results from the first review published in 2009, but does make the result more robust. Single dose oral etoricoxib produces high levels of good quality pain relief after surgery and adverse events did not differ from placebo. The 120 mg dose is as effective as, or better than, other commonly used analgesics.
引用
收藏
页数:39
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2003, BANDOLIERS LITTLE BO
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2001, CURRENT PAIN HEADACH, V11, P1059
  • [3] Relative efficacy of oral analgesics after third molar extraction
    Barden, J
    Edwards, JE
    McQuay, HJ
    Wiffen, PJ
    Moore, RA
    [J]. BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2004, 197 (07) : 407 - 411
  • [4] Outcomes in acute pain trials: systematic review of what was reported?
    Barden, J
    Edwards, JE
    Mason, L
    McQuay, HJ
    Moore, RA
    [J]. PAIN, 2004, 109 (03) : 351 - 356
  • [5] Pain and analgesic response after third molar extraction and other postsurgical pain
    Barden, J
    Edwards, JE
    McQuay, HJ
    Moore, RA
    [J]. PAIN, 2004, 107 (1-2) : 86 - 90
  • [6] Chalini S, 2005, Indian J Dent Res, V16, P47
  • [7] The analgesic efficacy of etoricoxib compared with oxycodone/acetaminophen in an acute postoperative pain model: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial
    Chang, DJ
    Desjardins, PJ
    King, TR
    Erb, T
    Geba, GP
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2004, 99 (03) : 807 - 815
  • [8] Single dose oral etoricoxib for acute postoperative pain in adults
    Clarke, Rachel
    Derry, Sheena
    Moore, R. Andrew
    McQuay, Henry J.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (02):
  • [9] The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres?
    Collins, SL
    Moore, RA
    McQuay, HJ
    [J]. PAIN, 1997, 72 (1-2) : 95 - 97
  • [10] Seeking a simple measure of analgesia for mega-trials: is a single global assessment good enough?
    Collins, SL
    Edwards, J
    Moore, RA
    Smith, LA
    McQuay, HJ
    [J]. PAIN, 2001, 91 (1-2) : 189 - 194