Biodiversity gains from efficient use of private sponsorship for flagship species conservation

被引:53
作者
Bennett, Joseph R. [1 ]
Maloney, Richard [2 ]
Possingham, Hugh P. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Ctr Biodivers & Conservat Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Christchurch Mail Ctr, Dept Conservat, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
[3] Silwood Pk Imperial Coll London, Sch Life Sci, Ascot SL5 7QN, Berks, England
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
threatened species; flagship species; flagship fleet; private sponsorship; prioritization protocol; biodiversity conservation; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; PHYLOGENETIC DIVERSITY; MAMMALS; PRIORITIZATION; EXTINCTION; ALLOCATION; RESOURCES; UMBRELLAS; COSTS; NEEDS;
D O I
10.1098/rspb.2014.2693
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
To address the global extinction crisis, both efficient use of existing conservation funding and new sources of funding are vital. Private sponsorship of charismatic 'flagship' species conservation represents an important source of new funding, but has been criticized as being inefficient. However, the ancillary benefits of privately sponsored flagship species conservation via actions benefiting other species have not been quantified, nor have the benefits of incorporating such sponsorship into objective prioritization protocols. Here, we use a comprehensive dataset of conservation actions for the 700 most threatened species in New Zealand to examine the potential biodiversity gains from national private flagship species sponsorship programmes. We find that private funding for flagship species can clearly result in additional species and phylogenetic diversity conserved, via conservation actions shared with other species. When private flagship species funding is incorporated into a prioritization protocol to preferentially sponsor shared actions, expected gains can be more than doubled. However, these gains are consistently smaller than expected gains in a hypothetical scenario where private funding could be optimally allocated among all threatened species. We recommend integrating private sponsorship of flagship species into objective prioritization protocols to sponsor efficient actions that maximize biodiversity gains, or wherever possible, encouraging private donations for broader biodiversity goals.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Umbrellas and flagships: Efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes? [J].
Andelman, SJ ;
Fagan, WF .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2000, 97 (11) :5954-5959
[2]   Balancing phylogenetic diversity and species numbers in conversation prioritization, using a case study of threatened species in New Zealand [J].
Bennett, Joseph R. ;
Elliott, Graeme ;
Mellish, Belinda ;
Joseph, Liana N. ;
Tulloch, Ayesha I. T. ;
Probert, William J. M. ;
Di Fonzo, Martina M. I. ;
Monks, Joanne M. ;
Possingham, Hugh P. ;
Maloney, Richard .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2014, 174 :47-54
[3]   Is conservation triage just smart decision making? [J].
Bottrill, Madeleine C. ;
Joseph, Liana N. ;
Carwardine, Josie ;
Bode, Michael ;
Cook, Carly N. ;
Game, Edward T. ;
Grantham, Hedley ;
Kark, Salit ;
Linke, Simon ;
McDonald-Madden, Eve ;
Pressey, Robert L. ;
Walker, Susan ;
Wilson, Kerrie A. ;
Possingham, Hugh P. .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2008, 23 (12) :649-654
[4]   Assessing the Value of the Umbrella-Species Concept for Conservation Planning with Meta-Analysis [J].
Branton, Margaret ;
Richardson, John S. .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2011, 25 (01) :9-20
[5]   Flagship species on covers of US conservation and nature magazines [J].
Clucas, Barbara ;
McHugh, Katherine ;
Caro, Tim .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2008, 17 (06) :1517-1528
[6]   Measuring the productivity of threatened-species programs [J].
Cullen, R ;
Fairburn, GA ;
Hughey, KFD .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 39 (01) :53-66
[7]  
Department of Conservation, 2011, Management Agreement Number: PAC-14-08-43
[8]   Threatened Species and the Potential Loss of Phylogenetic Diversity: Conservation Scenarios Based on Estimated Extinction Probabilities and Phylogenetic Risk Analysis [J].
Faith, Daniel P. .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2008, 22 (06) :1461-1470
[9]  
Garnett S, 2003, BIOSCIENCE, V53, P658, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0658:TCAEOF]2.0.CO
[10]  
2