Differential prognostic relevance of patho-anatomical factors among different tumor-biological subsets of breast cancer: Results from the adjuvant SUCCESS A study

被引:9
作者
Deniz, Miriam [1 ]
DeGregorio, Amelie [1 ]
DeGregorio, Nikolaus [1 ]
Bekes, Inga [1 ]
Widschwendter, Peter [1 ]
Schochter, Fabienne [1 ]
Ernst, Kristina [1 ]
Scholz, Christoph [1 ]
Bauer, Emanuel C. A. [1 ]
Aivazova-Fuchs, Viktoria [2 ]
Weissenbacher, Tobias [3 ]
Kost, Bernd [3 ]
Jueckstock, Julia [3 ]
Andergassen, Ullrich [3 ]
Steidl, Julia [3 ]
Trapp, Elisabeth [3 ]
Fasching, Peter A. [4 ]
Haeberle, Lothar [4 ]
Beckmann, Matthias W. [4 ]
Schneeweiss, Andreas [5 ]
Schrader, Iris [6 ]
Janni, Wolfgang [1 ]
Rack, Brigitte [1 ]
Friedl, Thomas W. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulm, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Prittwitzstr 43, D-89075 Ulm, Germany
[2] Klin Bad Trissl GmbH, Bad Trissl Str 73, D-83080 Oberaudorf, Germany
[3] Univ Munich, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Campus Innenstadt Ludwig Maximilian,Maistr 11, D-80539 Munich, Germany
[4] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nuremberg, Univ Hosp Erlangen, Comprehens Canc Ctr Erlangen EMN, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Schlosspl 4, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[5] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Grabengasse 1, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany
[6] Gynecol Oncol Off, Pelikanpl 23, D-30177 Hannover, Germany
关键词
High-risk breast cancer; Prognostic factors; Molecular subtype; Tumor size; Nodal stage; Interaction effects; HISTOLOGICAL GRADE; SURVIVAL; STAGE; WOMEN; RECURRENCE; CONSENSUS; SUBTYPES; SIZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.breast.2018.12.008
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: In breast cancer, large tumor size, positive nodal stage and a triple-negative tumor subtype are associated with reduced survival, but the interactions between these prognostic factors are not well understood. Material and methods: Here we re-evaluated the impact of tumor size, nodal stage and tumor subtype on disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) in a retrospective analysis using data from the adjuvant SUCCESS A trial. Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess whether the effect of tumor size and nodal stage on survival depended on tumor subtype. Results: Increasing tumor size, higher nodal stage and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) were associated with unfavorable prognosis (all p <0.001). There was no significant interaction between tumor subtype and tumor size (p > 0.5 for all four survival endpoints), but we found significant interactions between tumor subtype and nodal stage (p <0.05 for all four survival endpoints), with no differences in survival among tumor subtypes for patients with pN0 tumors (all p> 0.05) and pronounced differences in survival among tumor subtypes for patients with positive nodal stage (all p <0.001). Conclusions: This analysis confirms tumor size, nodal stage and tumor subtype as independent prognostic factors in high-risk early breast cancer. Nodal-positive patients with TNBC had a considerably worse outcome compared to nodal-positive patients with another tumor subtype. This underlines the importance for early detection particularly for patients with TNBC. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 89
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   The impact of molecular subtype on breast cancer recurrence in young women treated with contemporary adjuvant therapy [J].
Alabdulkareem, Hanan ;
Pinchinat, Tiffany ;
Khan, Sarah ;
Landers, Alyssa ;
Christos, Paul ;
Simmons, Rache ;
Moo, Tracy-Ann .
BREAST JOURNAL, 2018, 24 (02) :148-153
[2]  
Bartlett JM, 2016, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V108, P29
[3]  
CARTER CL, 1989, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V63, P181, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19890101)63:1<181::AID-CNCR2820630129>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-H
[5]   Prognostic and predictive factors in early-stage breast cancer [J].
Cianfrocca, M ;
Goldstein, LJ .
ONCOLOGIST, 2004, 9 (06) :606-616
[6]   De-escalating and escalating treatments for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2017 [J].
Curigliano, G. ;
Burstein, H. J. ;
Winer, E. P. ;
Gnant, M. ;
Dubsky, P. ;
Loibl, S. ;
Colleoni, M. ;
Regan, M. M. ;
Piccart-Gebhart, M. ;
Senn, H. -J. ;
Thurlimann, B. ;
Andre, F. ;
Baselga, J. ;
Bergh, J. ;
Bonnefoi, H. ;
Brucker, S. Y. ;
Cardoso, F. ;
Carey, L. ;
Ciruelos, E. ;
Cuzick, J. ;
Denkert, C. ;
Di Leo, A. ;
Ejlertsen, B. ;
Francis, P. ;
Galimberti, V. ;
Garber, J. ;
Gulluoglu, B. ;
Goodwin, P. ;
Harbeck, N. ;
Hayes, D. F. ;
Huang, C. -S. ;
Huober, J. ;
Khaled, H. ;
Jassem, J. ;
Jiang, Z. ;
Karlsson, P. ;
Morrow, M. ;
Orecchia, R. ;
Osborne, K. C. ;
Pagani, O. ;
Partridge, A. H. ;
Pritchard, K. ;
Ro, J. ;
Rutgers, E. J. T. ;
Sedlmayer, F. ;
Semiglazov, V. ;
Shao, Z. ;
Smith, I. ;
Toi, M. ;
Tutt, A. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28 (08) :1700-1712
[7]   Defining breast cancer prognosis based on molecular phenotypes: results from a large cohort study [J].
Dawood, Shaheenah ;
Hu, Rong ;
Homes, Michelle D. ;
Collins, Laura C. ;
Schnitt, Stuart J. ;
Connolly, James ;
Colditz, Graham A. ;
Tamimi, Rulla M. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2011, 126 (01) :185-192
[8]  
Edge S.B., 2010, AJCC cancer staging manual, V649
[9]   Histological grade provides significant prognostic information in addition to breast cancer subtypes defined according to St Gallen 2013 [J].
Ehinger, Anna ;
Malmstrom, Per ;
Bendahl, Par-Ola ;
Elston, Christopher W. ;
Falck, Anna-Karin ;
Forsare, Carina ;
Grabau, Dorthe ;
Ryden, Lisa ;
Stal, Olle ;
Ferno, Marten .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2017, 56 (01) :68-74
[10]  
Elnashar Afaf T, 2012, J Oncol Pharm Pract, V18, P68, DOI 10.1177/1078155211398299