Influence of the surface humidity, implant angulation, and interimplant distance on the accuracy and scanning time of complete-arch implant scans

被引:29
作者
Gomez-Polo, Miguel [1 ,2 ]
Ortega, Rocio [3 ]
Sallorenzo, Alessandro [4 ]
Agustin-Panadero, Ruben [5 ]
Barmak, Abdul B. [6 ,8 ]
Kois, John C. [7 ]
Revilla-Leon, Marta [9 ,10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Sch Dent, Dept Conservat Dent & Prosthodont, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Complutense Madrid, Sch Dent, Postgrad Program Adv Implant Prosthodont, Madrid, Spain
[3] European Univ Madrid, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthet Dent, Madrid, Spain
[4] Univ Complutense Madrid, Sch Dent, Dept Conservat Dent & Prosthodont, Adv Prosthodont, Madrid, Spain
[5] Univ Valencia, Sch Med & Dent, Dept Stomatol, Valencia, Spain
[6] Univ Rochester, Eastman Inst Oral Hlth, Clin Res & Biostat, Med Ctr, Rochester, NY USA
[7] Kois Ctr, Seattle, WA USA
[8] Univ Washington, Dept Restorat Dent, Grad Prosthodont, Seattle, WA USA
[9] Univ Washington, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Grad Prosthodont, Seattle, WA USA
[10] Kois Ctr, Res & Digital Dent, Seattle, WA USA
[11] Tufts Univ, Sch Dent Med, Dept Prosthodont, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Accuracy; Digital impression; Implant dentistry; Intraoral scanner; Prosthodontics; INTRAORAL SCANNERS; FIXED PROSTHODONTICS; IMPRESSIONS; EXPERIENCE; PRECISION; TRUENESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104307
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess the influence of implant angulation, humidity, and interimplant distance on the accuracy and scanning time of complete-arch implant scans.Methods: A definitive cast with 4 parallel implant abutment analogs (P group), and another cast with 4 angulated (up to 30 degrees) implant abutment analogs (NP group) were digitized by using a scanner (7Series) (reference scans). Two subgroups were created: dry (D subgroup) and wet (W subgroup). For the D subgroup, the casts were digitized without altering the surface humidity by using an intraoral scanner (IOS) (TRIOS 3). For the W sub-group, the cast surface was humidified with artificial saliva and digitized by using the same IOS. The interimplant distance discrepancies were assessed by computing linear and angular measurements. Trueness data was analyzed using 3-way ANOVA followed by the pairwise comparison Tukey tests. The Bartlett test, followed by the pairwise comparison tests, was used to assess the precision (alpha=.05).Results: Regarding the trueness, implant angulation (P<.001) and inter-implant distance measurement (P<.001) influenced the linear discrepancies. Implant angulation (P=.002), humidity conditions (P<.001), and inter -implant distance (P=.001) influenced the angular discrepancies. Regarding the precision, significant differ-ences in the variance of linear and angular measurements and inter-implant distances were found. Humidity conditions (P<.001) influenced the scanning time.Conclusions: Implant angulation, humidity, and interimplant distance influenced the accuracy and scanning time of complete-arch implant scans. Parallel implants resulted in higher trueness and precision values. Dry conditions resulted in slightly higher scanning trueness and precision and shorter scanning time. Clinical significance: Drying the surface being scanned increases intraoral scanning accuracy and decreases intraoral scanning time.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] A comparison of the precision of three-dimensional images acquired by 2 digital intraoral scanners: effects of tooth irregularity and scanning direction
    Anh, Ji-won
    Park, Ji-Man
    Chun, Youn-Sic
    Kim, Miae
    Kim, Minji
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2016, 46 (01) : 3 - 12
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1994, 57251 ISO
  • [3] Influence of implant scanbody material, position and operator on the accuracy of digital impression for complete-arch: A randomized in vitro trial
    Arcuri, Lorenzo
    Pozzi, Alessandro
    Lio, Fabrizio
    Rompen, Eric
    Zechner, Werner
    Nardi, Alessandra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH, 2020, 64 (02) : 128 - 136
  • [4] Accuracy of Digital vs Conventional Implant Impression Approach: A Three-Dimensional Comparative In Vitro Analysis
    Basaki, Kinga
    Alkumru, Hasan
    De Souza, Grace
    Finer, Yoav
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (04) : 792 - 799
  • [5] Effect of saliva isolation and intraoral light levels on performance of intraoral scanners
    Camc, Hasan
    Salmanpour, Farhad
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2020, 158 (05) : 759 - 766
  • [6] Trueness of Intraoral Scanners Considering Operator Experience and Three Different Implant Scenarios: A Preliminary Report
    Canullo, Luigi
    Colombo, Marco
    Menini, Maria
    Sorge, Patrizia
    Pesce, Paolo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2021, 34 (02) : 250 - 253
  • [7] Influence of Liquid on the Tooth Surface on the Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study
    Chen, Yuming
    Zhai, Zhihao
    Li, Hefei
    Yamada, Shuhei
    Matsuoka, Takashi
    Ono, Shinji
    Nakano, Tamaki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2022, 31 (01): : 59 - 64
  • [8] Digital Versus Conventional Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Prospective Study on 16 Edentulous Maxillae
    Chochlidakis, Konstantinos
    Papaspyridakos, Panos
    Tsigarida, Alexandra
    Romeo, Davide
    Chen, Yo-wei
    Natto, Zuhair
    Ercoli, Carlo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2020, 29 (04): : 281 - 286
  • [9] Chochlidakis KM, 2016, J PROSTHET DENT, V116, P184, DOI 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.017
  • [10] Effects of scan body exposure and operator on the accuracy of image matching of implant impressions with scan bodies
    Choi, Yong-Do
    Lee, Kyeong Eun
    Mai, Hang-Nga
    Lee, Du-Hyeong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 124 (03) : 379.e1 - 379.e6