Critical Success Factors for Construction Safety: Review and Meta-Analysis of Safety Leading Indicators

被引:84
作者
Alruqi, Wael M. [1 ]
Hallowell, Matthew R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, 1111 Engn Dr, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Construct Engn, 1111 Engn Dr,UCB 428, Boulder, CO 80302 USA
关键词
Construction safety; Active safety leading indicator; Passive safety leading indicator; Safety performance measure; Safety climate; Safety risk analysis; Meta-analysis; MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES; RISK ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; CLIMATE; INJURY; STRATEGIES; MOTIVATION; BEHAVIOR; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001626
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Safety leading indicators are measures of the safety management system that correlate with injury rates. The literature on the topic is dispersed and equivocal in the definition, categorization, and measurement of candidate indicators, which makes validation and replication difficult. This study includes a comprehensive review of safety leading indicator research, offers a distinction between leading indicators and other methods of safety prediction, and defines a clear method for distinguishing between active and passive indicators. By applying these definitions and leveraging empirical data, a statistical meta-analysis was performed to compute the relative effect sizes and significance for all salient indicators. Although active leading indicator research is rare and relatively recent, the meta-analysis indicates that inspections and pretask safety meetings correlate strongly with near-term project safety performance. Passive leading indicator research is relatively common and has been conducted for several decades. The results of the meta-analysis indicate that implementing safety recordkeeping, safety resource, staffing for safety, owner involvement, safety training/orientation, personal protective equipment, safety incentives program, and safety inspections and observation each improves long-term safety performance. The findings validate suspected leading indicators and serve as a first step toward standardization. Practitioners may use the findings to justify and target resource expenditures using pervasive scientific evidence.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 59 条
[51]   Enhancing Construction Worker Safety Performance Using Leading Indicators [J].
Rajendran, Sathyanarayanan .
PRACTICE PERIODICAL ON STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 18 (01) :45-51
[52]   Assessing risk in sustainable construction using the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) [J].
Rosa, Lucio Villarinho ;
Haddad, Assed Naked ;
Rodrigues de Carvalho, Paulo Victor .
COGNITION TECHNOLOGY & WORK, 2015, 17 (04) :559-573
[53]   Predictive Validity of Safety Leading Indicators: Empirical Assessment in the Oil and Gas Sector [J].
Salas, Rico ;
Hallowell, Matthew .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 142 (10)
[54]  
Sawacha E., 1999, International Journal of Project Management, V17, P309, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00042-8
[55]   Defining and Measuring Safety Climate: A Review of the Construction Industry Literature [J].
Schwatka, Natalie V. ;
Hecker, Steven ;
Goldenhar, Linda M. .
ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 2016, 60 (05) :537-550
[56]   Construction Safety Risk Modeling and Simulation [J].
Tixier, Antoine J. -P. ;
Hallowell, Matthew R. ;
Rajagopalan, Balaji .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2017, 37 (10) :1917-1935
[57]   Construction site safety roles [J].
Toole, TM .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2002, 128 (03) :203-210
[58]   The heterogeneity statistic I2 can be biased in small meta-analyses [J].
von Hippel, Paul T. .
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2015, 15
[59]   A probabilistic approach for safety risk analysis in metro construction [J].
Zhang, Limao ;
Skibniewski, Miroslaw J. ;
Wu, Xianguo ;
Chen, Yueqing ;
Deng, Qianli .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2014, 63 :8-17