Critical Success Factors for Construction Safety: Review and Meta-Analysis of Safety Leading Indicators

被引:84
作者
Alruqi, Wael M. [1 ]
Hallowell, Matthew R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, 1111 Engn Dr, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Construct Engn, 1111 Engn Dr,UCB 428, Boulder, CO 80302 USA
关键词
Construction safety; Active safety leading indicator; Passive safety leading indicator; Safety performance measure; Safety climate; Safety risk analysis; Meta-analysis; MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES; RISK ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; CLIMATE; INJURY; STRATEGIES; MOTIVATION; BEHAVIOR; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001626
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Safety leading indicators are measures of the safety management system that correlate with injury rates. The literature on the topic is dispersed and equivocal in the definition, categorization, and measurement of candidate indicators, which makes validation and replication difficult. This study includes a comprehensive review of safety leading indicator research, offers a distinction between leading indicators and other methods of safety prediction, and defines a clear method for distinguishing between active and passive indicators. By applying these definitions and leveraging empirical data, a statistical meta-analysis was performed to compute the relative effect sizes and significance for all salient indicators. Although active leading indicator research is rare and relatively recent, the meta-analysis indicates that inspections and pretask safety meetings correlate strongly with near-term project safety performance. Passive leading indicator research is relatively common and has been conducted for several decades. The results of the meta-analysis indicate that implementing safety recordkeeping, safety resource, staffing for safety, owner involvement, safety training/orientation, personal protective equipment, safety incentives program, and safety inspections and observation each improves long-term safety performance. The findings validate suspected leading indicators and serve as a first step toward standardization. Practitioners may use the findings to justify and target resource expenditures using pervasive scientific evidence.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Measuring effectiveness of safety programmes in the Thai construction industry [J].
Aksorn, Thanet ;
Hadikusumo, Bonaventura H. W. .
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2008, 26 (04) :409-421
[2]   Enhancing construction hazard recognition and communication with energy-based cognitive mnemonics and safety meeting maturity model: Multiple baseline study [J].
Albert, Alex ;
Hallowell, Matthew R. ;
Kleiner, Brian M. .
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2014, 140 (02)
[3]   Safety climate dimensions and their relationship to construction safety performance: A meta-analytic review [J].
Alruqi, Wael M. ;
Hallowell, Matthew R. ;
Techera, Ulises .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2018, 109 :165-173
[4]  
[Anonymous], PUT LEAD IND PRACT
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, INT STAT REV
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, METHODS METAANALYSIS
[7]   Comparative injury and fatality risk analysis of building trades [J].
Baradan, S ;
Usmen, MA .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2006, 132 (05) :533-539
[8]  
Biggs H.C., 2010, INT J TECHNOLOGY KNO, V6, P133, DOI DOI 10.18848/1832-3669/CGP/V06I03/56096
[9]  
Card N.A., 2011, APPL META ANAL SOCIA
[10]   Understanding a Contractor's Regional Variations in Safety Performance [J].
Chen, Qian ;
Jin, Ruoyu ;
Soboyejo, Alfred .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 139 (06) :641-653