Climate change research and the search for solutions: rethinking interdisciplinarity

被引:65
作者
Schipper, E. Lisa F. [1 ]
Dubash, Navroz K. [2 ]
Mulugetta, Yacob [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Environm Change Inst, Oxford OX1 3QY, England
[2] Ctr Policy Res, Dharma Marg, New Delhi 110021, India
[3] UCL, Dept Sci Technol Engn & Publ Policy, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT, England
关键词
Interdisciplinarity; Climate change research; Reductionism; Social science; Climate solutions; SCIENCE; KNOWLEDGE; CHALLENGES; QUESTION; POLICY; WORK;
D O I
10.1007/s10584-021-03237-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Growing political pressure to find solutions to climate change is leading to increasing calls for multiple disciplines, in particular those that are not traditionally part of climate change research, to contribute new knowledge systems that can offer deeper and broader insights to address the problem. Recognition of the complexity of climate change compels researchers to draw on interdisciplinary knowledge that marries natural sciences with social sciences and humanities. Yet most interdisciplinary approaches fail to adequately merge the framings of the disparate disciplines, resulting in reductionist messages that are largely devoid of context, and hence provide incomplete and misleading analysis for decision-making. For different knowledge systems to work better together toward climate solutions, we need to reframe the way questions are asked and research pursued, in order to inform action without slipping into reductionism. We suggest that interdisciplinarity needs to be rethought. This will require accepting a plurality of narratives, embracing multiple disciplinary perspectives, and shifting expectations of public messaging, and above all looking to integrate the appropriate disciplines that can help understand human systems in order to better mediate action.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] Linking Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge of Climate Change
    Alexander, Clarence
    Bynum, Nora
    Johnson, Elizabeth
    King, Ursula
    Mustonen, Tero
    Neofotis, Peter
    Oettle, Noel
    Rosenzweig, Cynthia
    Sakakibara, Chie
    Shadrin, Vyacheslav
    Vicarelli, Marta
    Waterhouse, Jon
    Weeks, Brian
    [J]. BIOSCIENCE, 2011, 61 (06) : 477 - 484
  • [2] Allen M, 2019, CONVERSATION 0418
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, INTERDISCIPLINARITY
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2018, An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5?C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development
  • [5] Barnes J, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P541, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE1775, 10.1038/nclimate1775]
  • [6] Bendell J, 2020, DEEPADAPTATION INFO
  • [7] Climate change and interdisciplinarity: a co-citation analysis of IPCC Third Assessment Report
    Bjurstrom, Andreas
    Polk, Merritt
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2011, 87 (03) : 525 - 550
  • [8] Now or Never: How Media Coverage of the IPCC Special Report on 1.5°C Shaped Climate-Action Deadlines
    Boykoff, Maxwell
    Pearman, Olivia
    [J]. ONE EARTH, 2019, 1 (03): : 285 - 288
  • [9] 'What do you mean?' The importance of language in developing interdisciplinary research
    Bracken, L. J.
    Oughton, E. A.
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF BRITISH GEOGRAPHERS, 2006, 31 (03) : 371 - 382
  • [10] Disciplinary capture and epistemological obstacles to interdisciplinary research: Lessons from central African conservation disputes
    Brister, Evelyn
    [J]. STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE PART C-STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF BIOLOGICAL AND BIOMEDIAL SCIENCES, 2016, 56 : 82 - 91