The effects of Task-Oriented Activity after applying Low Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Cerebral Motor Evoked Potential Emplitude and Latency in Stroke Patients

被引：2

作者：

Ma, Sung-Ryoung ^{[1
]}

Hang, Man-Seok ^{[2
]}

Song, Bo-Kyoung ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Shinsung Univ, Dept Occupat Therapy, Dangjin Si 31001, South Korea

[2] Kangwon Natl Univ, Dept Radiol Sci, 346 Hwangjo Gil, Dogye Eup Samcheok Si Ga 25945, South Korea

[3] Kangwon Natl Univ, Dept Occupat Therapy, Samcheok Si 25945, South Korea

来源：

JOURNAL OF MAGNETICS | 2017年 / 22卷 / 04期

关键词：

Low frequency (lHz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS); Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) amplitude; Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) latency; HEMIPARETIC STROKE; BRAIN-STIMULATION; CONTROLLED TRIAL; FOLLOW-UP; CORTEX; REHABILITATION; INHIBITION; PLASTICITY; RECOVERY; OUTPUT;

D O I：

10.4283/JMAG.2017.22.4.696

中图分类号：

T [工业技术];

学科分类号：

08 ;

摘要：

To investigate the effects of task-oriented activities under the residual effect after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on cerebral motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, cerebral motor evoked potential (MEP) latency in stroke patients, this study conducted an intervention program on two groups (experimental group - TIL, control groups GRT, each consisting of 10 patients) of chronic stroke patients. The program which was conducted three times a week for 6 weeks evaluated the MEP amplitudes, MEP latency before and after the experiment. In an inter-group test of MEP amplitude and MEP latency, all groups showed an increase between pre- and post-test evaluations. In an intergroup examination on MEP amplitude and MEP latency, a significant difference was observed between the TIL and GRT groups.

引用

页码：696 / 701

页数：6

共 29 条

[1]

BARKER AT, 1985, LANCET, V1, P1106

[2]

Carr J. H., 2003, STOKE REHABILITATION, P209

[3]

Choi K.-M., 2013, KOREAN J PSYCHOPHARM, V24, P160

[4] Post-stroke reorganization of brain motor output to the hand: a 2-4 month follow-up with focal magnetic transcranial stimulation [J].

Cicinelli, P ;

Traversa, R ;

Rossini, PM .

ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND MOTOR CONTROL-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 105 (06) :438-450

[5] The motor syndrome associated with exaggerated inhibition within the primary motor cortex of patients with hemiparetic stroke [J].

Classen, J ;

Schnitzler, A ;

Binkofski, F ;

Werhahn, KJ ;

Kim, YS ;

Kessler, KR ;

Benecke, R .

BRAIN, 1997, 120 :605-619

[6] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Motor Cortex after Stroke A Focused Review [J].

Corti, Manuela ;

Patten, Carolynn ;

Triggs, William .

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2012, 91 (03) :254-270

[7]

DAVIDOFF RA, 1990, NEUROLOGY, V40, P332

[8] Direct demonstration of interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex produced by transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].

Di Lazzaro, V ;

Oliviero, A ;

Profice, P ;

Insola, A ;

Mazzone, P ;

Tonali, P ;

Rothwell, JC .

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1999, 124 (04) :520-524

[9] A sham-controlled trial of a 5-day course of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients [J].

Fregni, Felipe ;

Boggio, Paulo S. ;

Valle, Angela C. ;

Rocha, Renata R. ;

Duarte, Julia ;

Ferreira, Merarl J. L. ;

Wagner, Tim ;

Fecteau, Shirley ;

Rigonatti, Sergio P. ;

Riberto, Marcelo ;

Freedman, Steven D. ;

Pascual-Leone, Alvaro .

STROKE, 2006, 37 (08) :2115-2122

[10] TECHNICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF MAGNETIC NERVE-STIMULATION [J].

JALINOUS, R .

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 8 (01) :10-25

← 1 2 3 →