Corporate social responsibility and corporate performance: Evidence from a panel of US listed companies

被引:82
作者
Becchetti, Leonardo [1 ]
Di Giacomo, Stefania [1 ]
Pinnacchio, Damiano [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dipartimento Econ & Ist, Fac Econ, I-00133 Rome, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00036840500428112
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We investigate whether inclusion and permanence in the domini social index (DSI) affects corporate performance on a sample of around 1000 firms in a 13-year interval by controlling for size, industry, business cycle and time invariant firm idiosyncratic characteristics. Our results find partial support to the hypothesis that corporate social responsibility is a move from the shareholders wealth to a multi-stakeholders welfare target. On the one side, permanence into the domini index (DI) is shown to increase (reduce) significantly total sales per employee (returns on equity but not when large and RD investing firms are excluded from the sample). On the other side, lower returns on equity for Domini firms seem nonetheless to be accompanied by relatively lower conditional volatility and lower reaction to extreme shocks with respect to the control sample. An explanation for these findings, suggested by the inspection of Domini criteria, is that social responsibility implies, on the one side, decisions leading to higher cost of labour and of intermediate output, but may, on the other side, enhance involvement, motivation and identification of the workforce with company goals with positive effects on productivity.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 567
页数:27
相关论文
共 48 条
[21]  
Freeman E., 1984, Stakeholder Management: A Stakeholder Approach, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139192675
[22]  
Friedman M., 1962, Capitalism and Freedom, VFortieth Anniversary Edition
[23]  
GERDTHAM UG, 2002, APPL EC SEP, P1679
[24]   Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels [J].
Im, KS ;
Pesaran, MH ;
Shin, Y .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2003, 115 (01) :53-74
[25]   ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE [J].
INGRAM, RW ;
FRAZIER, KB .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1980, 18 (02) :614-622
[26]   INSTRUMENTAL STAKEHOLDER THEORY - A SYNTHESIS OF ETHICS AND ECONOMICS [J].
JONES, TM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1995, 20 (02) :404-437
[27]  
Maddala GS, 1999, OXFORD B ECON STAT, V61, P631, DOI 10.1111/1468-0084.61.s1.13
[28]   NEW METHODS IN STATISTICAL ECONOMICS [J].
MANDELBROT, B .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1963, 71 (05) :421-440
[29]   THE VARIATION OF CERTAIN SPECULATIVE PRICES [J].
MANDELBROT, B .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 1963, 36 (04) :394-419
[30]  
McWilliams A, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P603, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200005)21:5<603::AID-SMJ101>3.0.CO