Robust hybrid supervisory control for spacecraft close proximity missions

被引:4
作者
Malladi, Bharani P. [1 ]
Sanfelice, Ricardo G. [2 ]
Butcher, Eric A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Aerosp & Mech Engn, 1130 N Mt Ave, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Dept Comp Engn, 1156 High St MS SOE3, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
MODEL-PREDICTIVE CONTROL; FEEDBACK-CONTROL; GUIDANCE; POSITION; TRACKING; ATTITUDE; SYSTEMS; DOCKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.arcontrol.2021.11.001
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
We consider the problem of rendezvous, proximity operations, and docking of an autonomous spacecraft. The problem can be conveniently divided into three phases: (1) rendezvous phase; (2) docking phase; and (3) docked phase. On each phase the task to perform is different, and requires a different control algorithm. Angle and range measurements are available for the entire mission, but constraints and tasks to perform are different depending on the phase. Due to the different constraints, available measurements, and tasks to perform on each phase, we study this problem using a hybrid systems approach, in which the system has different modes of operation for which a suitable controller is to be designed. Following this approach, we characterize the family of individual controllers and the required properties they should induce to the closed-loop system to solve the problem within each phase of operation. Furthermore, we propose a supervisory algorithm that robustly coordinates the individual controllers so as to provide a solution to the problem. In addition, we present specific controller designs that appropriately solve the control problems for individual phases and validate them numerically.
引用
收藏
页码:316 / 329
页数:14
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Alfriend KT, 2010, SPACECRAFT FORMATION FLYING: DYNAMICS, CONTROL, AND NAVIGATION, P1, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-7506-8533-7.00206-2
  • [2] Bressan A., 1999, PATCHY VECTOR FIELDS, V4, P445
  • [3] CHAN N, 2017, P IEEE C DEC CONTR C, P1427
  • [4] Chan N., 2017, EPiC Series in Computing, V48, P20, DOI 10.29007/thb4
  • [5] TERMINAL GUIDANCE SYSTEM FOR SATELLITE RENDEZVOUS
    CLOHESSY, WH
    WILTSHIRE, RS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 1960, 27 (09): : 653 - &
  • [6] CRANE JR, 2018, NETWORKED AUTONOMOUS, P94
  • [7] Model Predictive Control approach for guidance of spacecraft rendezvous and proximity maneuvering
    Di Cairano, S.
    Park, H.
    Kolmanovsky, I.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBUST AND NONLINEAR CONTROL, 2012, 22 (12) : 1398 - 1427
  • [8] Uniting global and local controllers under acting disturbances
    Efimov, DV
    [J]. AUTOMATICA, 2006, 42 (03) : 489 - 495
  • [9] Model Predictive Control in Aerospace Systems: Current State and Opportunities
    Eren, Utku
    Prach, Anna
    Kocer, Basaran Bahadir
    Rakovic, Sasa V.
    Kayacan, Erdal
    Acikmese, Behcet
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2017, 40 (07) : 1541 - 1566
  • [10] Farahani SS, 2016, IEEE DECIS CONTR P, P3306, DOI 10.1109/CDC.2016.7798766