Delta radiomic features improve prediction for lung cancer incidence: A nested case-control analysis of the National Lung Screening Trial

被引:30
作者
Cherezov, Dmitry [1 ]
Hawkhis, Samuel H. [2 ]
Goldga, Dmitry B. [1 ]
Hall, Lawrence O. [1 ]
Liu, Ying [2 ,3 ]
Li, Qian [2 ,3 ]
Balagurtmathan, Yoganand [2 ]
Gillies, Robert J. [2 ]
Schabath, Matthew B. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Tampa, FL USA
[2] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Canc Physiol, Tampa, FL USA
[3] Tianjin Med Univ, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Key Lab Canc Prevent & Therapy, Canc Inst & Hosp,Dept Radiol, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[4] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Canc Epidemiol, Tampa, FL USA
关键词
early detection; lung cancer screening; National Lung Screening Trial; quantitative imaging; Radiomics; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; PULMONARY NODULES; BIOMARKERS; ADENOCARCINOMA; ASSOCIATION; PERFORMANCE; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.1852
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Current guidelines for lung cancer screening increased a positive scan threshold to a 6 mm longest diameter. We extracted radiomic features from baseline and follow-up screens and performed size-specific analyses to predict lung cancer incidence using three nodule size classes (<6 mm [small], 6-16 mm [intermediate], and >= 16 mm [large]). Methods We extracted 219 features from baseline (T0) nodules and 219 delta features which are the change from T0 to first follow-up (T1). Nodules were identified for 160 incidence cases diagnosed with lung cancer at T1 or second follow-up screen (T2) and for 307 nodule-positive controls that had three consecutive positive screens not diagnosed as lung cancer. The cases and controls were split into training and test cohorts; classifier models were used to identify the most predictive features. Results The final models revealed modest improvements for baseline and delta features when compared to only baseline features. The AUROCs for small- and intermediate-sized nodules were 0.83 (95% CI 0.76-0.90) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.71-0.81) for baseline-only radiomic features, respectively, and 0.84 (95% CI 0.77-0.90) and 0.84 (95% CI 0.80-0.88) for baseline and delta features, respectively. When intermediate and large nodules were combined, the AUROC for baseline-only features was 0.80 (95% CI 0.76-0.84) compared with 0.86 (95% CI 0.83-0.89) for baseline and delta features. Conclusions We found modest improvements in predicting lung cancer incidence by combining baseline and delta radiomics. Radiomics could be used to improve current size-based screening guidelines.
引用
收藏
页码:6340 / 6356
页数:17
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening [J].
Aberle, Denise R. ;
Adams, Amanda M. ;
Berg, Christine D. ;
Black, William C. ;
Clapp, Jonathan D. ;
Fagerstrom, Richard M. ;
Gareen, Ilana F. ;
Gatsonis, Constantine ;
Marcus, Pamela M. ;
Sicks, JoRean D. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 365 (05) :395-409
[2]   Baseline Characteristics of Participants in the Randomized National Lung Screening Trial [J].
Aberle, Denise R. ;
Adams, Amanda M. ;
Berg, Christine D. ;
Clapp, Jonathan D. ;
Clingan, Kathy L. ;
Gareen, Ilana F. ;
Lynch, David A. ;
Marcus, Pamela M. ;
Pinsky, Paul F. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2010, 102 (23) :1771-1779
[3]   Biomarkers of risk to develop lung cancer in the new screening era [J].
Atwater, Thomas ;
Massion, Pierre P. .
ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2016, 4 (08)
[4]   Test-Retest Reproducibility Analysis of Lung CT Image Features [J].
Balagurunathan, Yoganand ;
Kumar, Virendra ;
Gu, Yuhua ;
Kim, Jongphil ;
Wang, Hua ;
Liu, Ying ;
Goldgof, Dmitry B. ;
Hall, Lawrence O. ;
Korn, Rene ;
Zhao, Binsheng ;
Schwartz, Lawrence H. ;
Basu, Satrajit ;
Eschrich, Steven ;
Gatenby, Robert A. ;
Gillies, Robert J. .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2014, 27 (06) :805-823
[5]   SMOTE for high-dimensional class-imbalanced data [J].
Blagus, Rok ;
Lusa, Lara .
BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2013, 14
[6]   Clinical validation of an autoantibody test for lung cancer [J].
Boyle, P. ;
Chapman, C. J. ;
Holdenrieder, S. ;
Murray, A. ;
Robertson, C. ;
Wood, W. C. ;
Maddison, P. ;
Healey, G. ;
Fairley, G. H. ;
Barnes, A. C. ;
Robertson, J. F. R. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2011, 22 (02) :383-389
[7]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[8]  
Carvalho S., 2016, Radiotherapy and Oncology, V118, pS20
[9]   SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique [J].
Chawla, Nitesh V. ;
Bowyer, Kevin W. ;
Hall, Lawrence O. ;
Kegelmeyer, W. Philip .
2002, American Association for Artificial Intelligence (16)
[10]  
Cohen W. W., 1995, Machine Learning. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Machine Learning, P115