ProsCan for men: Randomised controlled trial of a decision support intervention for men with localised prostate cancer

被引:27
作者
Chambers, Suzanne K. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ferguson, Megan [1 ]
Gardiner, R. A. [3 ,4 ]
Nicol, David [5 ]
Gordon, Louisa [6 ]
Occhipinti, Stefano [2 ]
Aitken, Joanne [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Canc Council Queensland, Viertel Ctr Res Canc Control, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Griffith Univ, Sch Psychol, Brisbane, Qld 4111, Australia
[3] Australian Prostate Canc Collaborat, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Queensland, Dept Surg, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[5] Princess Alexandra Hosp, Dept Urol, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia
[6] Queensland Inst Med Res, Canc & Populat Hlth Studies, Brisbane, Qld 4006, Australia
[7] Univ Queensland, Sch Populat Hlth, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2407-8-207
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Prostate cancer is the most common male cancer in the Western world but is highly heterogeneous in disease progression and outcomes. Consequently, the most substantial morbidity may actually arise from the adverse psychosocial impact of distress in decision-making and long term quality of life effects such as impotence. This paper presents the design of a randomised controlled trial of a decision support/psychosocial intervention for men newly diagnosed with localised prostate cancer. Methods/Design: 350 men per condition (700 men in total) have been recruited after diagnosis and before treatment through urology private practices and hospital outpatient clinics and randomised to 1) a tele-based nurse delivered five session decision support/psychosocial intervention or 2) a usual care control group. Two intervention sessions are delivered before treatment that address decision support, stress management and preparation for treatment. Three further sessions are provided three weeks, seven weeks and five months after treatment that focus on adjustment to cancer, problem solving and coping with treatment side effects. Participants are assessed at baseline (before treatment) and 2, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post-treatment. Outcome measures include: cancer threat appraisal; decision-related distress and bother from treatment side effects; involvement in decision making; satisfaction with health care; heath care utilisation; use of health care resources; and a return to previous activities. Discussion: The study will provide recommendations about the efficacy of early decision support to facilitate adjustment after prostate cancer. As well the study will identify men diagnosed with localised prostate cancer at risk of poorer long term psychosocial adjustment. Trial Registration: ACTRN012607000233426.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Abbas F, 1997, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V80, P827, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970901)80:5<827::AID-CNCR1>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-I
[3]   The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration [J].
Altman, DG ;
Schulz, KF ;
Moher, D ;
Egger, M ;
Davidoff, F ;
Elbourne, D ;
Gotzsche, PC ;
Lang, T .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (08) :663-694
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, A problem solving approach: Helping cancer patients cope
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, The Cochrane Library
[6]  
*AUSTR CANC NETW W, 2002, CLIN PRACT GUID EV B, P1
[7]  
BAADE PD, 2008, MOLE NUTR F IN PRESS
[8]   The prevalence and predictors of psychological distress in men with prostate cancer who are seeking support [J].
Balderson, N ;
Towell, T .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 8 :125-134
[9]   The prevalence and predictors of psychological distress in patients with early localized prostate cancer [J].
Bisson, JI ;
Chubb, HL ;
Bennett, S ;
Mason, M ;
Jones, D ;
Kynaston, H .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 90 (01) :56-61
[10]   Validation of a decision regret scale [J].
Brehaut, JC ;
O'Connor, AM ;
Wood, TJ ;
Hack, TF ;
Siminoff, L ;
Gordon, E ;
Feldman-Stewart, D .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2003, 23 (04) :281-292