Tariff regulation with energy efficiency goals

被引:22
作者
Abrardi, Laura [1 ]
Cambini, Carlo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Torino, DIGEP, I-10129 Turin, Italy
[2] IEFE Bocconi, Milan, Italy
[3] EUI Florence Sch Regulat, Florence, Italy
关键词
Energy efficiency; Demand-side regulation; Decoupling; Price-cap; POLICIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2015.01.017
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We study the optimal tariff structure that could induce a regulated utility to promote energy efficiency by its customers given that it is privately informed about the effectiveness of its effort on demand reduction. The regulator should optimally offer a menu of incentive compatible two-part tariffs. If the firm's energy efficiency activities have a high impact on demand reduction, the consumer should pay a high fixed fee but a low per unit price, approximating the tariff structure to a decoupling policy, which strengthens the firm's incentives to pursue energy conservation. Instead, if the firm's effort to adopt energy efficiency actions is scarcely effective, the tariff is characterized by a low fixed fee but a high price per unit of energy consumed, thus shifting the incentives for energy conservation on consumers. The optimal tariff structure also depends on the cost of the consumer's effort (in case the consumer can also adopt energy efficiency measures) and on the degree of substitutability between the consumer's and the firm's efforts. (c) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 131
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[21]  
Kushler M., 2006, ALIGNING UTILI UNPUB
[22]  
LEWIS TR, 1992, AM ECON REV, V82, P1321
[23]  
Moskovitz D., 1989, PROFITS PROGR UNPUB
[24]   A multi-criteria evaluation framework for tradable white certificate schemes [J].
Mundaca, Luis ;
Neij, Lena .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (11) :4557-4573
[25]  
Sant R., 1980, HARVARD BUSINESS REV
[26]  
Sappington DavidE. M., 2001, ELECT J, V14, P71
[27]  
Stoft S., 1994, YALE J REGUL, V11, P1
[28]   Review of policies and measures for energy efficiency in industry sector [J].
Tanaka, Kanako .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (10) :6532-6550