Artificial biofilm removal in a peri-implant mucositis model: Efficacy of air polishing technology as adjunct to ultrasonic debridement alone and impact of the site and the depth of mucosal tunnel-An in vitro study

被引:6
作者
Discepoli, Nicola [1 ]
Mirra, Raffaele [1 ]
Vesentin, Cecilia [1 ]
Marruganti, Crystal [1 ]
Ferrari, Marco [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Siena, Dept Med Biotechnol, Unit Periodont, Siena, Italy
[2] Univ Siena, Dept Med Biotechnol, Unit Dent Mat & Fixed Prosthodont, Siena, Italy
关键词
abutment; debridement; dental implants; glycine; in vitro techniques; ultrasonics; MAINTENANCE; PREVENTION; SURVIVAL; DISEASES;
D O I
10.1111/cid.13077
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim The current in vitro model aims to evaluate the adjunctive effect on artificial biofilm removal determined by the use of a glycine-powder air-polishing procedure (GPAP) over the ultrasonic debridement (USD) alone when the removal of artificial biofilm on abutment surface is performed. The procedures were carried out also evaluating the impact of the site (mesial, distal, vestibular, and oral) and three different mucosal tunnel depths (2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm). Materials and Methods Single tooth implant replacement was simulated. Three different abutment heights together with a prosthetic contour were investigated (2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm); custom-made gingival masks were created to mimic peri-implant soft tissue. Biofilm was simulated with an indelible ink. The protocol consisted in two intervention stages for each abutment: (a) USD with PEEK tip plus (b) GPAP. At the end of each intervention, abutments were unscrewed, and standardized photographs were taken. Statistical analysis was carried out to compare residual stain percentage between the two intervention stages and among different sites and mucosal tunnels. Results A total of 30 abutments were instrumented. A significant reduction of the percentage of residual staining (PRS) after the combination of GPAP + USD over USD alone was demonstrated (16% vs. 32%; p < 0.05). Moreover, the better performance of the GPAP + USD protocol was observed regardless of the different mucosal tunnel heights and the sites analyzed. Intragroup analysis unveils that the smaller PRS was observed for shallow mucosal tunnels (2 mm) and vestibular sites for both protocols. Conclusion GPAP + USD provided adjunctive effect on artificial biofilm removal in comparison to the USD alone. Furthermore, proximal surfaces and deeper mucosal tunnels (4 and 6 mm) showed a reduced instrumentation efficacy for both protocols.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 250
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Dimension of the periimplant mucosa - Biological width revisited
    Berglundh, T
    Lindhe, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1996, 23 (10) : 971 - 973
  • [2] Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions
    Berglundh, Tord
    Armitage, Gary
    Araujo, Mauricio G.
    Avila-Ortiz, Gustavo
    Blanco, Juan
    Camargo, Paulo M.
    Chen, Stephen
    Cochran, David
    Derks, Jan
    Figuero, Elena
    Hammerle, Christoph H. F.
    Heitz-Mayfield, Lisa J. A.
    Guy Huynh-Ba
    Iacono, Vincent
    Koo, Ki-Tae
    Lambert, France
    McCauley, Laurie
    Quirynen, Marc
    Renvert, Stefan
    Salvi, Giovanni E.
    Schwarz, Frank
    Tarnow, Dennis
    Tomasi, Cristiano
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    Zitzmann, Nicola
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2018, 45 : S286 - S291
  • [3] The depth of the implant mucosal tunnel modifies the development and resolution of experimental peri-implant mucositis: A case-control study
    Chan, Dave
    Pelekos, George
    Ho, Dominic
    Cortellini, Pierpaolo
    Tonetti, Maurizio S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2019, 46 (02) : 248 - 255
  • [4] Peri-implant disease in subjects with and without preventive maintenance: a 5-year follow-up
    Costa, Fernando Oliveira
    Takenaka-Martinez, Satoshi
    Miranda Cota, Luis Otavio
    Ferreira, Sergio Diniz
    Magalhaes Silva, Geraldo Lucio
    Costa, Jose Eustaquio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2012, 39 (02) : 173 - 181
  • [5] Daubert DM., 2000, PERIODONTOL 2000, V81, p29
  • [6] Adjunctive glycine powder air-polishing for the treatment of peri-implant mucositis: an observational clinical trial
    De Siena, F.
    Corbella, S.
    Taschieri, S.
    Del Fabbro, M.
    Francetti, L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTAL HYGIENE, 2015, 13 (03) : 170 - 176
  • [7] Peri-implant mucositis
    Heitz-Mayfield, Lisa J. A.
    Salvi, Giovanni E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2018, 45 : S237 - S245
  • [8] Primary prevention of peri-implantitis: Managing peri-implant mucositis
    Jepsen, Soren
    Berglundh, Tord
    Genco, Robert
    Aass, Anne Merete
    Demirel, Korkud
    Derks, Jan
    Figuero, Elena
    Giovannoli, Jean Louis
    Goldstein, Moshe
    Lambert, France
    Ortiz-Vigon, Alberto
    Polyzois, Ioannis
    Salvi, Giovanni E.
    Schwarz, Frank
    Serino, Giovanni
    Tomasi, Cristiano
    Zitzmann, Nicola U.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2015, 42 : S152 - S157
  • [9] Effect of glycine powder air-polishing as an adjunct in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis: a pilot clinical trial
    Ji, Ying-Jie
    Tang, Zhi-Hui
    Wang, Ren
    Cao, Jie
    Cao, Cai-Fang
    Jin, Li-Jian
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2014, 25 (06) : 683 - 689
  • [10] Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years
    Jung, Ronald E.
    Zembic, Anja
    Pjetursson, Bjarni E.
    Zwahlen, Marcel
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2012, 23 : 2 - 21