A comparison of miniplates and teeth for orthodontic anchorage

被引:10
作者
Kim, Soojin [1 ]
Herring, Susan [2 ]
Wang, I-Chung [3 ]
Alcalde, Rafael
Mak, Victor
Fu, Isaac
Huang, Greg [2 ]
机构
[1] USA, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Orthodont, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Periodont, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
ENDOSSEOUS TITANIUM IMPLANTS; INTRUSION; MOLARS; MOVEMENT; SCREWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.07.016
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: In this study, we investigated orthodontic space closure of premolar extraction sites with miniplate anchorage compared with conventional tooth-borne anchorage in 8 adult beagle dogs. Methods: A split-mouth design with all 4 quadrants was used. Four premolars were extracted to create adequate space for premolar retraction. Retraction was performed with nickel-titanium coil springs. In the control side, the premolars were retracted against other teeth, and, in the experimental side, the premolars were retracted against miniplates. Each quadrant received 2 additional bone screws as bone markers for cephalometric superimposition. Lateral cephalograms were taken at initial activation, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. Three parameters were measured and evaluated: linear space closure, angular tipping, and amount of anchorage slippage. Results: Overall, the miniplates had a high success rate of 93.8% (15 of 16) during the 12-week period of orthodontic loading. Similar amounts of space closure were observed in the control and the experimental sites. A statistically significant difference was observed for the amounts of tipping and anchorage slippage of miniplates vs tooth-borne anchorage. In the maxilla, the mean miniplate tipping was 0.1, whereas mean tipping of the anchor teeth was 9 (P=.01). In the mandible, the miniplates tipped an average of 3.4, whereas the mean tipping of the anchor teeth was 13.3 degrees (P =.02). In the maxilla, the miniplates had 1% anchorage loss, whereas the tooth anchors had 37.1% anchorage loss (P =.001). In the mandible, the miniplates had a mean anchorage loss of 4.5%, whereas the tooth anchors had a mean anchorage loss of 31.1% (P =.001). Conclusions: Although the total amount of space closure was similar in both the control and the experimental groups, the mechanism of space closure was different. In the control group, slippage of the anchor teeth accounted for approximately a third of the space closure. In the experimental group, the miniplates had minimal movement, and space closure was achieved almost entirely by movement of the target teeth. These results confirm that miniplates provide virtually absolute anchorage.
引用
收藏
页码:189.e1 / 189.e9
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Bae Seong-Min, 2002, J Clin Orthod, V36, P298
  • [2] A NEW DEVICE FOR ABSOLUTE ANCHORAGE FOR ORTHODONTICS
    BLOCK, MS
    HOFFMAN, DR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1995, 107 (03) : 251 - 258
  • [3] A clinical evaluation of titanium miniplates as anchors for orthodontic treatment
    Choi, BH
    Zhu, SJ
    Kim, YH
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2005, 128 (03) : 382 - 384
  • [4] Costa A, 1998, Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, V13, P201
  • [5] Dahlberg G., 1940, STAT METHOD MEDICAL
  • [6] The use of small titanium screws for orthodontic anchorage
    Deguchi, T
    Takano-Yamamoto, T
    Kanomi, R
    Hartsfield, JK
    Roberts, WE
    Garetto, LP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 (05) : 377 - 381
  • [7] Use of an onplant as orthodontic anchorage
    Janssens, F
    Swennen, G
    Dujardin, T
    Glineur, R
    Malevez, C
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2002, 122 (05) : 566 - 570
  • [8] Kanomi R, 1997, J Clin Orthod, V31, P763
  • [9] Lee J S, 2001, J Clin Orthod, V35, P643
  • [10] Do miniscrews remain stationary under orthodontic forces?
    Liou, EJW
    Pai, BCJ
    Lin, JCY
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2004, 126 (01) : 42 - 47