The Next Frontier of Outcomes Research: Collaborative Quality Initiatives

被引:9
作者
Billig, Jessica I.
Kotsis, Sandra V.
Chung, Kevin C.
机构
[1] VA Ann Arbor Healthcare Syst, VA Ctr Clin Management Res, VA Natl Clinician Scholars Program, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Michigan Med, Sect Plast Surg, Ann Arbor, MI USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; HEALTH-CARE; OF-CARE; RISK; RECONSTRUCTION; OPERATIONS; REGISTRIES; ADULTS; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0000000000006748
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Quality improvement efforts at the federal level have instituted both rewards and penalties as incentives to improve health care quality. However, neither of these methods has shown long-lasting improvements. Furthermore, many programs have focused on decreasing mortality or hospital readmissions, measurements that are not applicable to many surgical fields, including plastic surgery. One model that has been shown to be effective is a collaborative quality initiative that uses a pay-for-participation method whereby participants learn from one another and institute changes to improve patient care. Many of these changes are process measures that are easier to implement and quicker to show improvement than structural or outcome measures. Regional collaborative quality initiatives have been developed in other surgical specialties such as bariatric surgery and urology. Currently, the authors are establishing a new collaborative quality initiative for hand surgery: the Michigan Collaborative Hand Initiative for Quality in Surgery. It is a collaboration of nine sites with the goal of identifying areas that are in need of quality improvement in hand surgery and implementing measures to improve on them. The authors believe that collaborative quality initiatives will promote high-quality care and should be incorporated into the field of plastic surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1315 / 1322
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
ABIM Foundation, Choosing Wisely
[2]  
American Society for Quality, WHAT IS PLAN CHECK A
[3]  
American Society of Plastic Surgeons, TRACK OP OUTC PLAST
[4]  
American Society of Plastic Surgeons, EV BAS CLIN PRACT GU
[5]   Who is at greatest risk for receiving poor-quality health care? [J].
Asch, SM ;
Kerr, EA ;
Keesey, J ;
Adams, JL ;
Setodji, CM ;
Malik, S ;
McGlynn, EA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (11) :1147-1156
[6]   Scoping Review of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in Plastic Surgery Research [J].
Augustine, Haley F. M. ;
Hu, Jiayi ;
Najarali, Zainab ;
McRae, Matthew .
PLASTIC SURGERY, 2019, 27 (01) :54-65
[7]   Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. [J].
Begg, CB ;
Riedel, ER ;
Bach, PB ;
Kattan, MW ;
Schrag, D ;
Warren, JL ;
Scardino, PT .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (15) :1138-1144
[8]   A Nationwide Analysis of Cost Variation for Autologous Free Flap Breast Reconstruction [J].
Billig, Jessica I. ;
Lu, Yiwen ;
Momoh, Adeyiza O. ;
Chung, Kevin C. .
JAMA SURGERY, 2017, 152 (11) :1039-1047
[9]   Operative mortality and procedure volume as predictors of subsequent hospital performance [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Dimick, JB ;
Staiger, DO .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2006, 243 (03) :411-417
[10]   Measuring the quality of surgical care: Structure, process, or outcomes? [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Dimick, JB ;
Birkmeyer, NJO .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2004, 198 (04) :626-632