Assessing probability of malignancy in solid solitary pulmonary nodules with a new Bayesian calculator: improving diagnostic accuracy by means of expanded and updated features

被引:56
作者
Soardi, G. A. [1 ]
Perandini, Simone [1 ]
Motton, M. [1 ]
Montemezzi, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Azienda Osped Univ Integrata Verona, Dept Radiol, I-37124 Verona, Italy
关键词
Solitary pulmonary nodule; Bayesian analysis; Decision analysis; Lung neoplasms; Medical informatics; LUNG-CANCER; FLEISCHNER-SOCIETY; DECISION-MAKING; CT; VALIDATION; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; LIKELIHOOD; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-014-3396-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives A crucial point in the work-up of a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) is to accurately characterise the lesion on the basis of imaging and clinical data available. We introduce a new Bayesian calculator as a tool to assess and grade SPN risk of malignancy. Methods A set of 343 consecutive biopsy or interval proven SPNs was used to develop a calculator to predict SPN probability of malignancy. The model was validated on the study population in a "round-robin" fashion and compared with results obtained from current models described in literature. Results In our case series, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.893 for the proposed model and 0.795 for its best competitor, which was the Gurney calculator. Using observational thresholds of 5 % and 10 % our model returned fewer false-negative results, while showing constant superiority in avoiding false-positive results for each surgical threshold tested. The main downside of the proposed calculator was a slightly higher proportion of indeterminate SPNs. Conclusions We believe the proposed model to be an important update of current Bayesian analysis of SPNs, and to allow for better discrimination between malignancies and benign entities on the basis of clinical and imaging data.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 162
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Ashby D, 2000, STAT MED, V19, P3291, DOI 10.1002/1097-0258(20001215)19:23<3291::AID-SIM627>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-T
[3]  
Blomberg L.C., 2013, SBSI 2013 S BRAS SIS
[4]   BAYESIAN-ANALYSIS REVISITED - A RADIOLOGISTS SURVIVAL GUIDE [J].
CHANG, PJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1989, 152 (04) :721-727
[5]   Solitary pulmonary nodules and masses: a meta-analysis of the diagnostic utility of alternative imaging tests [J].
Cronin, Paul ;
Dwamena, Ben A. ;
Kelly, Aine Marie ;
Bernstein, Steven J. ;
Carlos, Ruth C. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (09) :1840-1856
[6]  
CUMMINGS SR, 1986, AM REV RESPIR DIS, V134, P449
[7]  
Davies Ben, 2005, Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, V4, P18, DOI 10.1510/icvts.2004.091843
[8]   Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008 [J].
Ferlay, Jacques ;
Shin, Hai-Rim ;
Bray, Freddie ;
Forman, David ;
Mathers, Colin ;
Parkin, Donald Maxwell .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 127 (12) :2893-2917
[9]   Evaluation of patients with pulmonary nodules: When is it lung cancer? ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition) [J].
Gould, Michael K. ;
Fletcher, James ;
Iannettoni, Mark D. ;
Lynch, William R. ;
Midthun, David E. ;
Naidich, David P. ;
Ost, David E. .
CHEST, 2007, 132 (03) :108S-130S
[10]   A clinical model to estimate the pretest probability of lung cancer in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules [J].
Gould, Michael K. ;
Ananth, Lakshmi ;
Barnett, Paul G. .
CHEST, 2007, 131 (02) :383-388