Comparative analysis of conventional diesel-electric and hypothetical battery-electric heavy haul locomotive operation in terms of fuel savings and emissions reduction potentials

被引:32
作者
Cipek, Mihael [1 ]
Pavkovic, Danijel [1 ]
Krznar, Matija [1 ]
Kljaic, Zdenko [2 ]
Mlinaric, Tomislav Josip [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zagreb, Fac Mech Engn & Naval Architecture, Zagreb, Croatia
[2] Ericsson Nikola Tesla Dd, Zagreb, Croatia
[3] Univ Zagreb, Fac Transport & Traff Sci, Zagreb, Croatia
关键词
Battery electric locomotive; Mountain rail route; Modelling; Emissions reduction; Advanced transportation technologies; ENERGY; ELECTRIFICATION; VEHICLES; TRAINS;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2021.121097
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The paper considers a novel approach to heavy-haul of railway freight by means of combined operation of conventional diesel-electric and battery-electric locomotives either in single or joint (tandem) operation. A backward-looking quasi-static model of a battery-electric locomotive is proposed, based on the undercarriage of a decommissioned conventional diesel-electric locomotive equipped with a sufficiently sized battery energy storage system. In order to facilitate power flow control from the battery-electric locomotive and to avoid deep battery discharges a suitable control rule is introduced aimed at modulating the driver power (throttle Notch) command in order to maintain the battery state-of-charge above the safe lower limit during discharging. The effectiveness of the proposed approach has been verified by means of simulations for the considered mountainous railway route driving scenario, including realistic railway track slope and speed limitations. The results show that between 22% and 30% fuel cost savings may be achieved, along with reduced emissions of exhaust gases by using the proposed battery-electric locomotive in combination (tandem) with the conventional diesel-electric one. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, VIT RAILW INFR PAN D
[2]  
Barbee G.V., U.S. Patent, Patent No. [2010/02758 10, 20100275810]
[3]  
Bin Y, 2010, PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME DYNAMIC SYSTEMS AND CONTROL CONFERENCE 2009, PTS A AND B, P245
[4]  
Brenna M., 2019, IEEE VEHICLE POWER, P1, DOI 10.1109/VPPC46532.2019.8952376
[5]  
Buzzoni L, 2012, ELECT SYST AIRCRAFT, P2, DOI [10.1109/ESARS.2012.6387464, DOI 10.1109/ESARS.2012.6387464]
[6]   Profitability of Frequency Regulation by Electric Vehicles in Denmark and Japan Considering Battery Degradation Costs [J].
Calearo, Lisa ;
Marinelli, Mattia .
WORLD ELECTRIC VEHICLE JOURNAL, 2020, 11 (03) :1-15
[7]   Batteries Need Electronics [J].
Cao, Jian ;
Emadi, Ali .
IEEE INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS MAGAZINE, 2011, 5 (01) :27-35
[8]  
Cipek M, 2020, HYP CONV MOD CONV HE
[9]   Assessment of battery-hybrid diesel-electric locomotive fuel savings and emission reduction potentials based on a realistic mountainous rail route [J].
Cipek, Mihael ;
Pavkovic, Danijel ;
Kljaic, Zdenko ;
Mlinaric, Tomislav Josip .
ENERGY, 2019, 173 :1154-1171
[10]  
Cosic A., 2014, SUSTRAIL FP7 PROJECT