Choice Set Size and Decision Making: The Case of Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Plans

被引:32
作者
Bundorf, M. Kate [1 ]
Szrek, Helena [2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Hlth Res & Policy, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Porto, Ctr Finance & Econ, Oporto, Portugal
关键词
Medicare Part D; prescription drugs; choice; decision making; insurance; TOO; ASSORTMENT; ADULTS; NUMBER; OLDER; LURE;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X09357793
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. The impact of choice on consumer decision making is controversial in US health policy. Objective. The authors' objective was to determine how choice set size influences decision making among Medicare beneficiaries choosing prescription drug plans. Methods. The authors randomly assigned members of an Internet-enabled panel age 65 and older to sets of prescription drug plans of varying sizes (2, 5, 10, and 16) and asked them to choose a plan. Respondents answered questions about the plan they chose, the choice set, and the decision process. The authors used ordered probit models to estimate the effect of choice set size on the study outcomes. Results. Both the benefits of choice, measured by whether the chosen plan is close to the ideal plan, and the costs, measured by whether the respondent found decision making difficult, increased with choice set size. Choice set size was not associated with the probability of enrolling in any plan. Conclusions. Medicare beneficiaries face a tension between not wanting to choose from too many options and feeling happier with an outcome when they have more alternatives. Interventions that reduce cognitive costs when choice sets are large may make this program more attractive to beneficiaries.
引用
收藏
页码:582 / 593
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [11] FRANK R, 2007, 200703 BROOK I
  • [12] How Much Choice Is Too Much? The Case of the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit
    Hanoch, Yaniv
    Rice, Thomas
    Cummings, Janet
    Wood, Stacey
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2009, 44 (04) : 1157 - 1168
  • [13] Hargrave E., 2009, Medicare prescription drug plans in 2009 and key changes since 2006
  • [14] Who failed to enroll in Medicare Part D, and why? Early results
    Heiss, Florian
    McFadden, Daniel
    Winter, Joachim
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2006, 25 (05) : W344 - W354
  • [15] Can Medicare beneficiaries make informed choices?
    Hibbard, JH
    Jewett, JJ
    Engelmann, S
    Tusler, M
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 1998, 17 (06) : 181 - 193
  • [16] Is the informed-choice policy approach appropriate for Medicare beneficiaries?
    Hibbard, JH
    Slovic, P
    Peters, E
    Finucane, ML
    Tusler, M
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2001, 20 (03) : 199 - 203
  • [17] Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options: A review and theoretical analysis
    Hsee, CK
    Loewenstein, GF
    Blount, S
    Bazerman, MH
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1999, 125 (05) : 576 - 590
  • [18] Doing better but feeling worse - Looking for the "best'' job undermines satisfaction
    Iyengar, SS
    Wells, RE
    Schwartz, B
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 17 (02) : 143 - 150
  • [19] When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?
    Iyengar, SS
    Lepper, MR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 79 (06) : 995 - 1006
  • [20] Kahn BarbaraE., 1995, J CONSUM PSYCHOL, V4, P305, DOI DOI 10.1207/S15327663JCP0404_01